Fortinet FCSS_NST_SE-7.6 Fortinet NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Exam Practice Test

The correct answer is D .

The study guide shows the ipsmonitor test usage exactly:

1: Display IPS engine information

2: Toggle IPS engine enable/disable status

5: Toggle bypass status

99: Restart all IPS engines and monitor

So diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5 is used to toggle bypass status , which corresponds to enabling IPS bypass mode .

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because disabling the IPS engine is option 2 , not 5.

B is wrong because the study guide does not define option 5 as IPS session information.

C is wrong because restarting all IPS engines and monitors is option 99 , not 5.

So the verified answer is: D .

To determine the cause of the failure, we must analyze the IKEv2 debug output provided in the exhibit (image_ad3dc6.jpg):

Identify the Negotiation Phase:

The debug log shows: responder received CREATE_CHILD exchange.

In IKEv2, the CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is used to create new Child SAs (Phase 2) or to rekey existing ones.

The fact that the tunnel was previously " brought up successfully " implies the initial IKE SA (Phase 1) is stable, and this error is occurring specifically during a rekey event, which often involves Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS).

Analyze the Proposals (The Mismatch):

Incoming Proposal (Remote Peer):

The remote peer sends a proposal containing two Diffie-Hellman groups: type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14) and type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP1536 (Group 5).

My Proposal (Local FortiGate):

The local FortiGate configuration expects: type=DH_GROUP, val=MODP3072 (Group 15).

Result of the Negotiation:

The debug output concludes with: no proposal chosen and Negotiate SA Error.

This error occurs because the local FortiGate cannot find a common Diffie-Hellman group between what it requires (Group 15) and what the peer is offering (Groups 14 or 5).

While this is technically a mismatch occurring during the Phase 2 (Child SA) creation, " A Diffie-Hellman mismatch " (Option A) is the precise root cause identified in the logs.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: The log shows received create-child request, confirming that UDP traffic is reaching the device and is not blocked.

C: The failure is in the CREATE_CHILD exchange (Phase 2/Rekey), not the IKE_SA_INIT or IKE_AUTH (Phase 1) exchanges.

D: While the mismatch is occurring within the Phase 2 definitions, Option A is the specific technical reason for the no proposal chosen error shown in the DH_GROUP lines.

Auxiliary sessions in Fortinet are designed to support ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) and SD-WAN scenarios, allowing sessions to be handled efficiently when traffic needs to be dynamically distributed across multiple links. With the auxiliary session setting enabled, FortiGate creates additional session table entries for each possible path in ECMP or SD-WAN—meaning that if the routing path changes (such as a link failover), a new session can be immediately activated and offloaded to the NP6 network processor for acceleration, ensuring minimal disruption. This greatly benefits high-throughput deployments.

Official documentation specifies that when auxiliary sessions are enabled, FortiGate doesn’t just rely on dynamically creating new sessions after a routing event, it proactively creates sessions for all potential paths. This means that in the event of a route change, two sessions exist and the traffic is quickly re-routed and offloaded, maximizing performance and reliability. Without this feature, multiple paths cannot be efficiently offloaded, and routing changes trigger a single session update, reducing failover performance.

The correct answers are C, D, and E .

The study guide lists the exact OSPF adjacency requirements :

“Interfaces of peers are the same type and in the same OSPF area”

“Each peer has a unique router ID”

“OSPF authentication, if enabled, is successful”

These map directly to:

C. OSPF interface network types match

D. Authentication settings match

E. OSPF router IDs are unique

The same study-guide slide also states other requirements such as:

peers’ primary IPs must be in the same subnet with the same mask

hello and dead intervals must match

OSPF MTUs must match

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because link cost matching is not listed as an adjacency requirement . OSPF cost affects path selection, not whether adjacency can form.

B is wrong because interface priority does not need to be unique . Priority is used for DR/BDR election, where the highest priority wins, and ties are broken by router ID.

So the verified answers are: C, D, E .

The key point is that the two VPNs are dynamic dialup IPsec tunnels on the same interface and both are using IKEv1 main mode . In this design, FortiGate cannot reliably distinguish which dialup phase1 to match before phase 1 completes.

The uploaded Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide shows that XAuth happens only after phase 1 is already established:

“The IKE real-time debug shows, after phase 1, the exchange of extended authentication (XAuth) packets… You can also see the CFG_REPLY, showing the XAuth user and group name.”

That means the user group is learned too late to be used for selecting the correct phase1 definition. So the fix must be applied to the phase1 matching method itself , not to XAuth.

The FortiOS administration guide gives the exact rule for this scenario:

“When the remote VPN peer has a dynamic IP address and is authenticated by a pre-shared key you must select Aggressive mode if there is more than one dialup phase 1 configuration for the interface IP address.”

The correct answer is A . This behavior is dictated by the configuration command set snat-route-change enable shown in Exhibit 1 under config system global.

Routing Change: By changing the priority of route ID 2 from 10 to 0, it becomes lower than route ID 1 (priority 5). In FortiOS, a lower priority value indicates a more preferred route. Consequently, the active route for the destination changes from port1 to port2 .

SNAT Implication: The existing session (shown in Exhibit 2) is using Source NAT (SNAT) with the IP address associated with port1 (10.200.1.1). If the traffic were simply switched to port2 , the source IP would be incorrect for that interface and the return traffic would likely fail or be dropped.

snat-route-change enable: This specific setting instructs the FortiGate on how to handle established SNAT sessions when a routing change occurs that alters the preferred outgoing interface. When enabled, if a route change forces an SNAT session to a new interface, FortiGate flushes (deletes) the session from the session table. This is necessary because a live TCP session cannot survive a change in its source IP address. The client must initiate a new session, which will then be created using the new correct route (port2) and the corresponding new SNAT IP.

If this setting were disabled, the session would likely remain " sticky " to the original interface (port1) until it closed, provided the route still existed. However, the explicit configuration forces the deletion.

The issue is caused by the strict matching logic of the configured Prefix List.

Current State: The rule is edit 1 with set prefix 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 and both ge (greater than or equal) and le (less than or equal) are unset.

Behavior: When ge and le are unset, FortiOS requires an exact match of the subnet mask. The current rule only matches the exact network 172.16.0.0/16. It denies 172.16.52.0/24 because the mask (/24) does not match the rule ' s mask (/16).

To fix this and inject 172.16.52.0/24, you must modify the list to match the /24 mask:

A. Add another entry to the prefix list to specifically allow the 172.16.52.0/24 network:

Creating a new rule (e.g., edit 2) with set prefix 172.16.52.0 255.255.255.0 will provide an exact match for the incoming route, allowing it to pass the distribute-list.

B. Change the ge value to 17:

By configuring set ge 17 on the existing rule (conceptually 172.16.0.0/16 ge 17), you change the logic from " exact match " to " range match " .

This configuration tells the router to match any prefix starting with 172.16.x.x that has a subnet mask length of 17 or greater.

Since the incoming route is a /24, and 24 is greater than 17, the route will match the prefix list and be accepted.

Why other options are incorrect:

C: The option text appears to read " Change the ... value to 16 " . If this refers to le 16, it would enforce the mask to be exactly /16 or less, which still excludes /24.

D: Changing the default behavior to implicit allow defeats the purpose of a filter (security control) and is not a standard configuration step for fixing a single missing route.

The correct answer is D .

In the exhibit, get router info routing-table database shows both static default routes:

0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 100.64.2.254, port2

0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 100.64.1.254, port1

But get router info routing-table all shows only:

0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 100.64.1.254, port1

The study guide explains that get router info routing-table all displays the routes that make it to the FIB — the best active routes . It also says that this command doesn’t show standby or inactive routes , which can remain only in the routing table database. It gives the exact rule: “when two static routes to the same destination subnet have different distances, the one with the lower distance is installed in the routing table, and the one with the higher distance is installed in the routing table database.”

The study guide also shows the route selection process:

Most specific route

Lowest distance

Lowest metric (dynamic routes)

Lowest priority (static routes)

ECMP

So the port2 default route is absent from the second output because its distance is 20 , while the port1 default route has distance 10 . The lower-distance route is installed in the active routing table/FIB.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the exhibit does not indicate port2 is down or disabled.

B and C are wrong because priority is checked only after distance for static routes. Here, the routes already differ by distance , so priority is not the deciding factor.

So the verified answer is: D .

The get router info ospf database brief output on FGT-2 clearly indicates that Area 0.0.0.5 is configured as a [Stub] area.

In OSPF, a Stub Area is specifically designed to reduce the size of the Link State Database (LSDB) on internal routers. The primary behavior of a Stub area is that it does not accept Type 5 (AS External) LSAs .

FGT-3 is the ASBR (Autonomous System Border Router) and is importing static routes, which are generated as Type 5 LSAs in the OSPF domain.

FGT-1 acts as the ABR (Area Border Router). Because Area 0.0.0.5 is a Stub area, FGT-1 blocks these Type 5 LSAs from entering Area 0.0.0.5.

Consequently, FGT-2 will not receive the specific external routes advertised by FGT-3. Instead, the ABR (FGT-1) injects a default route (0.0.0.0/0) into the Stub area to allow connectivity to the external world, which is visible in the database output.

While the question text mentions FGT-3 not receiving routes, the definitive configuration shown in the exhibit is the Stub area setting, which directly corresponds to the blocking of Type 5 LSA propagation (Option A).

The exhibit includes these key debug lines:

start_search_dn-base: ' DC=TAC,DC=ottawa,DC=fortinet,DC=com ' filter:sAMAccountName=jsmith

get_all_dn-Found DN 1:CN=John Smith,CN=Users,DC=TAC,DC=ottawa,DC=fortinet,DC=com

The study guide explains that in regular bind , LDAP authentication has four steps , and that during step 2 , FortiGate searches the LDAP tree to find the user’s DN:

“During the second step, FortiGate does a search query in the LDAP database to find the user’s location—in other words, the user’s DN. If the user is found, the server replies with the user’s DN.”

It also states for the real-time debug of step 2:

“An fnbamd_ldap_build_dn_search_req-base message indicates that FortiGate is performing step two: searching for the user in the LDAP tree. This message includes the base branch (distinguished name setting) and the name of the attribute used to locate the user... If the LDAP server finds the user, the output shows the user’s full DN.”

That directly proves:

D is correct because the debug is showing step 2: Search Request

A is correct because the base DN and found DN are under DC=TAC,DC=ottawa,DC=fortinet,DC=com, which corresponds to the LDAP domain/tree root TAC.ottawa.fortinet.com

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because binding with the user’s credentials is step 3 , not the step shown here. The study guide says: “Step 3 – Bind user credentials” and shows that this happens later with fnbamd_ldap_build_userbind_req / __ldap_build_bind_req-Binding to ' CN=John Smith... '

C is wrong because collecting user group information is step 4 , not the step shown in the exhibit. The study guide says: “The last step is to get the user group information” and shows step 4 with Attr query / memberOf search

The correct answer is A .

The debug flow shows:

traffic is going to TCP port 211

FortiGate logs run helper-ftp(dir=original)

The study guide explains exactly what that message means:

“In this example, the run helper-ftp message indicates that the FTP session helper is being used.”

Under normal proxy-based inspection, protocol handling is controlled by Protocol Options . The FortiOS administration guide states:

“Protocol port mapping only works with proxy-based inspection.” and “The ports can be modified to inspect any port with flowing traffic.”

So if the policy is configured for proxy-based inspection but the debug still shows the FTP session helper on port 211, the most likely explanation is that the FTP protocol mapping in Protocol Options is broad enough to match unexpectedly, such as being mapped to Any . That would cause FortiGate to identify the traffic as FTP and invoke the helper.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because SSL deep inspection is unrelated to this debug. The traffic shown is plain TCP/211 , and the key message is about the FTP helper , not SSL decryption.

C is wrong because if FTP had not been mapped to port 211, FortiGate would be less likely to treat this traffic as FTP. The observed run helper-ftp indicates FTP handling is being triggered.

D is wrong because low-memory conserve behavior would typically cause inspection bypass or blocking behavior, not specifically the run helper-ftp message. The study guide’s helper example ties this message to session-helper use, not memory shortage.

So the verified answer is: A .

The 7.6 study guide explains the route selection order:

“Route Selection Process

Most specific route

Lowest distance

Lowest metric (dynamic routes)

Lowest priority (static routes)

ECMP (static, BGP, and OSPF routes)”**

It then states:

“If there are multiple routes with the same netmask, distance, metric, and priority, FortiGate shares the traffic among all of them. This is called equal-cost multi-path (ECMP).”

The FortiOS administration guide confirms the ECMP prerequisite:

“Routes must have the same destination and costs. In the case of static routes costs include distance and priority.”

In the exhibit, the kernel/FIB output shows the two default routes as:

gwy=100.64.1.254 dev=3 (port1) prio=0

gwy=100.64.2.254 dev=6 (port2) prio=10

So although both are default routes, their priorities are different . Since FortiGate uses the FIB/kernel for forwarding traffic, ECMP will not happen until the static-route priorities are the same. The study guide also notes that the FIB is the table used to perform standard routing

Therefore, to make the two default routes eligible for ECMP, the administrator must make the priorities equal. Since port2 is already 10, the needed change is to set the port1 default route priority to 10.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because snat-route-change affects how existing SNAT sessions react to routing changes, not whether static routes qualify for ECMP

B is wrong because changing port2 to priority 1 still would not match port1 at 0, so the routes still would not have equal cost for ECMP

C is wrong because preserve-session-route affects existing-session route persistence after routing changes, not ECMP qualification

To understand why Type 5 LSAs (AS External LSAs) are missing from the Link-State Database (LSDB), we must look at how OSPF generates and propagates them:

A. There is no autonomous system border router (ASBR) in the network:

Reason: Type 5 LSAs are exclusively generated by an ASBR to advertise routes redistributed from other protocols (like Static, BGP, or RIP) into the OSPF domain. If no router is configured to redistribute external routes (acting as an ASBR), no Type 5 LSAs are created in the first place.

C. The local router is located in a stub area:

Reason: By definition, a Stub Area (and a Totally Stubby Area) prevents Type 5 LSAs from entering. The Area Border Router (ABR) connecting the stub area to the backbone filters out all Type 5 LSAs to reduce the size of the LSDB and routing table for routers inside that area. Instead, a default route is usually injected.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: While database filtering exists, standard prefix-list filtering typically affects the routing table (RIB) generation, not the underlying LSDB propagation of Type 5 LSAs, or it is less common than the architectural reasons (Stub/No ASBR).

D: IP Protocol 89 is the transport for OSPF itself. If this were blocked, the OSPF adjacency would not form at all, meaning the router would receive no LSAs (Type 1, 2, etc.), not specifically just Type 5.

The study guide states:

“FortiGate categorizes an entry in the session table as an ephemeral session when it is a TCP session that is not fully established (three-way handshake not completed), or when it is a UDP session with only one packet received.”

This directly proves:

A is correct because a UDP session with only one packet received is ephemeral.

C is correct because a TCP session waiting for the SYN/ACK is not fully established , so it is ephemeral. The study guide’s TCP state table shows that the handshake is only completed when the session reaches ESTABLISHED

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because once UDP traffic has been seen in both directions , it is no longer the “single packet received” condition described for ephemeral sessions. The study guide says for UDP: 00 = one way , 01 = both ways

D is wrong because a TCP session waiting for FIN/ACK is already in the closing stage after establishment, not in the “not fully established” stage. The study guide explains that after both sides close the session, FortiGate can keep it briefly in the table in state value 5 for out-of-order packets after FIN/ACK

To solve this high CPU usage scenario involving the ipsengine, we must understand the specific functions of the diagnose test application ipsmonitor commands shown in the troubleshooting steps.

Analyze the Situation:

Exhibit: The diagnose sys top output shows the ipsengine process is in a run state (R) consuming 99% CPU.

Previous Action: The administrator already ran diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5.

Result: The CPU usage did not drop.

Understand the Commands:

diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5: This command toggles IPS Bypass Mode. When enabled, the IPS engine lets traffic pass through without inspection.

Implication: If the CPU was high due to traffic volume, enabling bypass would drop the CPU load immediately.

Failure: Since the CPU remained at 99% after bypass, the ipsengine process is likely frozen, stuck, or in an internal infinite loop unrelated to the current traffic flow. The process itself is the problem, not the traffic volume.

Evaluate the Solution (Option B):

diagnose test application ipsmonitor 2: This command toggles the IPS engine ' s Enable/Disable status.

Because the engine is stuck (bypass failed to relieve pressure), the " Immediate action " required is to stop or restart the process entirely.

Running option 2 effectively disables/kills the stuck IPS engine instance, which will immediately drop the CPU usage to near zero. (It can then be toggled again to restart it).

Why other options are incorrect:

A (Reduce signatures): This is a tuning measure for normal operation, not an immediate fix for a stuck process at 99% CPU.

C (Disable IPS on policies): This is a configuration change that takes time and requires a commit; it is not the most immediate diagnostic tool available.

D (Bypass all IPS engines): This describes the action of command 5 (Bypass), which the prompt explicitly states was already performed and failed.

The Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide explicitly explains this debug message:

“iprope_in_check() check failed, drop” means the packet is destined to a FortiGate IP address and one of these conditions applies:

The service is not enabled

The service is using a different TCP port

The source IP address is not included in the trusted host list

The packet matches a local-in policy with action deny

That directly confirms C. Trusted host list misconfiguration .

Why D is the second valid choice:

The FortiOS administration guide explains that:

“IP pools and VIPs are considered local IP addresses if responding to ARP requests on these external IP addresses is enabled … the FortiGate is considered a destination for those IP addresses … once an IP pool or VIP has been configured … the FortiGate considers it as a local address and will not forward traffic based on the routing table.”

Because iprope_in_check() is a local-in/local-destination type failure, a VIP or IP pool misconfiguration can cause traffic to be treated as destined for the FortiGate itself, which can then trigger this drop condition if the matching local service/local-in handling is not valid. So D is the closest supported second answer from the available choices.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because policy route problems are not the documented meaning of this specific debug message. The study guide instead ties iprope_in_check() check failed, drop to management/local-in conditions.

B is wrong because the study guide says traffic shaping drops appear as: “Denied by quota check”

For Option A:In Fortinet BGP (and standard BGP), when a prefix is displayed with an " i " (lowercase i) in the Path column, it represents an internal prefix that originated from the local router, typically configured via the BGP " network " command. In the exhibit, the prefix 10.20.30.0/24 is listed with a Path value of i, indicating it was injected into BGP by the local router using the network statement, not via redistribution from another routing protocol. The same logic applies to i as documented: " Origin code ' i ' means the route was injected via the network command. "

For Option D:The get router info bgp network output is a summary table displaying both local and received BGP routes. It lists all known routes to the BGP process, whether received from peers or originated locally. The exhibit shows all BGP prefixes known to the local router, matching the official admin guide’s description of this command’s output.

Explanation for B and C:

The phrase “legacy route advertisement” is not formalized in BGP documentation or Fortinet’s admin guide; the output uses standard BGP mechanics.

If a route was redistributed into BGP from another routing protocol, the Path field would display a " ? " (question mark) for incomplete (redistributed) origin. Here the /24 route has " i " so it is NOT a redistribution.

The correct answer is D. The inbound IPsec SA was copied to the NPU.

The exhibit shows:

npu_flag=02

dec_npuid=1

enc_npuid=0

The study guide gives the exact meaning of the npu_flag field:

npu_flag=00 = Both IPsec SAs loaded to the kernel

npu_flag=01 = Outbound IPsec SA copied to NPU

npu_flag=02 = Inbound IPsec SA copied to NPU

npu_flag=03 = Both outbound and inbound IPsec SAs copied to NPU

It also explains: “If the first IPsec packet is inbound and can be offloaded, the inbound SA is copied to the NPU and the npu_flag changes to 02. After both SAs are copied to the NPU, the npu_flag changes to 03.”

So with npu_flag=02, only the inbound SA has been copied to the NPU. That makes D correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because outbound-only offload would be npu_flag=01, not 02

C is wrong because both directions offloaded would be npu_flag=03, not 02

B is wrong because dec_npuid=1 identifies the NPU ID used for decryption, but it does not state that the processor is specifically NP6 . The study guide only maps the offload state through the npu_flag values in this context, not the NPU model from this field alone

So the verified answer is: D .

The IKE_SA_INIT exchange in IKEv2 is responsible for DoS protection measures. During IKE_SA_INIT, before authentication and further exchange, the responder can use cookie challenges (per RFC 7296 and Fortinet VPN documentation). If a DoS attack is suspected (many requests from the same source), the responder replies with a cookie. Only after the initiator returns the correct cookie does the exchange proceed, protecting the responder from state exhaustion and certain forms of DoS traffic at the handshake stage.

The exhibit shows a FortiGate configuration under config system fortiguard related to web filtering and FortiGuard options. There is a line:

set webfilter-force-off enable

According to official Fortinet documentation, the " webfilter-force-off " option, when enabled, causes the FortiGate to bypass web filtering for all traffic—even if a web filter profile is applied to a policy. This override is typically used for troubleshooting or performance reasons and is documented as an explicit bypass feature.

If an administrator wants to enforce web filtering inspection, this setting must be disabled. The correct way to restore web filtering functionality is to run:

set webfilter-force-off disable

Once done, traffic passing through policies with web filter profiles will be inspected and filtered as per configuration. Other settings such as timeout or cache TTL do not bypass web filtering; they only affect operational nuances.

We must analyze the flags (*, > , S, O, B) and Administrative Distances (AD) shown in the get router info routing-table database exhibit to determine the correct statements.

Analysis for Option A (The BGP route to 10.0.4.0/24 is not in the forwarding information base):

True. Look at the entry for 10.0.4.0/24.

There is an OSPF route: O * > 10.0.4.0/24 [110/2]. The * indicates it is in the FIB, and > indicates it is the selected route.

There is a BGP route: B 10.0.4.0/24 [200/10]. This line lacks the * flag.

Reason: The OSPF route has an Administrative Distance of 110. The BGP route (iBGP) has an AD of 200. Since 110 is lower than 200, OSPF wins, and the BGP route is not installed in the Forwarding Information Base (FIB).

Analysis for Option B (The default static route through 10.200.1.254 is in the forwarding information base):

True. Look at the 0.0.0.0/0 entries.

The first entry is S * > 0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 10.200.1.254.

The * flag confirms this specific route is installed in the FIB.

The second static route (via 10.200.2.254) has a higher distance ([20/0]) and no * flag, so it is inactive.

Why C is False: ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) requires routes to have the same cost/priority. Here, one static route has AD 10 and the other has AD 20. They are not equal, so ECMP is not performed.

Why D is False: The routing table database shows active routes, not the raw Link State Advertisement (LSA) database. You cannot determine the number of LSAs received solely from this output.

The correct answers are A and B .

The Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide states under OSPF Troubleshooting :

“Follow these steps to troubleshoot an OSPF problem between two peers:

Check that the local router can reach the remote peer. IP addresses must be in the same subnet and have the same subnet mask.

Ensure that IP protocol 89 is not blocked.

Hello and dead intervals must match.

The OSPF router ID for each peer must be unique. Duplicate router IDs are not allowed.

Do the MTUs match?

If authentication is enabled, the type and password must match on both sides.”**

The same page also summarizes the troubleshooting tips as:

“Do peers have an IP address within the same subnet?”

“Is IP protocol 89 blocked?”

This directly confirms:

A is correct

B is correct

Why the other options are wrong:

C is wrong because TCP port 179 is used by BGP , not OSPF. OSPF uses IP protocol 89 , as the study guide explicitly notes

D is wrong because the study guide’s OSPF adjacency troubleshooting checklist does not require an active static route to the peer. OSPF neighbors form adjacency on directly reachable networks, and the guide instead focuses on same subnet, protocol 89, intervals, router ID, MTU, and authentication matching

So the verified answers are: A, B .

The correct answer is D .

The exhibit shows:

session_count=591

clash=162

memory_tension_drop=0

TCP sessions:

166 in NONE state

1 in ESTABLISHED state

3 in SYN_SENT state

2 in TIME_WAIT state

The study guide explains the TCP protocol states and states explicitly:

“When a session is closed by both the sender and receiver, FortiGate keeps that session in the session table for a few seconds, to allow for any out-of-order packets that might arrive after the FIN/ACK packet. This is the state value 5.”

In diagnose sys session stat, the exhibit shows 2 in TIME_WAIT state . Since TIME_WAIT = state value 5 , those are the sessions being kept briefly for possible out-of-order packets. That makes D correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because session_count=591 is the total number of sessions, while the TCP sessions shown add up to only 172 (166 + 1 + 3 + 2). So not all sessions in the table are TCP sessions.

B is wrong because the study guide says the number of sessions deleted because of low free memory is shown by memory_tension_drop , and in the exhibit it is 0 , not 162.

C is wrong because the study guide defines ephemeral/open TCP sessions as those not fully established , but the exhibit does not say all 166 in NONE state are specifically “waiting to complete the three-way handshake.” The clearest directly supported statement from the displayed states is the 2 TIME_WAIT sessions retained for out-of-order packets.

So the verified answer is: D .

FortiGate HA Troubleshooting and Synchronization Guides

Fortinet Admin Guide: HA Primary Role Retention, Cluster Break-up Due to Out-of-Sync Status

The study guide identifies this exact output as an expectation session created by the FTP session helper :

“run helper-ftp” indicates the FTP helper is in use.

“FortiGate created an expectation session and opened the pinhole port for the expected return traffic”

It also explains why this exists:

“Another important function of the session helper is to temporarily create an expected session (or pinhole) for the data channel connection that comes from the server.”

“The session helper automatically creates the session and opens the door for the incoming connection.”

“These incoming TCP sessions use random TCP port numbers.”

That directly proves C is correct.

For A , the exhibit shows expire=23. The study guide explains the expire field as the length of time until the session expires if no matching traffic arrives, and the FortiOS guide states for expectation sessions:

“Expectation sessions usually have a timeout value of 30 seconds. If the communication from the server is not initiated within 30 seconds the expectation session times out and traffic will be denied.”

So with expire=23, FortiGate will allow that expected traffic only for the remaining 23 seconds; after that, it times out and the traffic is denied. That makes A correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is not supported . The study guide describes expectation sessions as being created by the session helper from the control-session negotiation, not as independent objects unaffected by the master session.

D is wrong as stated. Even though the output contains policy_id=25, the study guide explicitly says the incoming expected connection is allowed by the expected session itself, “even when no firewall policy allows it.”

To determine the type of policy route, we must interpret the specific flags and fields visible in the diagnose firewall proute list (or similar kernel table) output provided in the exhibit

Identify Key Indicators:

The most critical field in the output is vwl_service=1(test123).

It also lists vwl_mbr_seq=1 5.

Decode the Terminology:

vwl: This stands for Virtual WAN Link. In FortiOS, " Virtual WAN Link " is the legacy internal name for the SD-WAN feature. Even in newer firmware versions (7.x), the kernel and CLI debugs often still refer to SD-WAN objects as vwl.

vwl_service: This specifically refers to an SD-WAN Rule (also known as an SD-WAN Service). The name (test123) is the name given to that specific SD-WAN rule by the administrator.

Evaluate the Options:

A & D (Regular Policy Route): Standard policy routes (configured under config router policy) do not carry the vwl_service tag. They are typically identified by simple gateway or interface instructions without the SD-WAN service abstraction.

B (ISDB Route): While SD-WAN rules can use the Internet Service Database (ISDB) as a destination, the structure of the route entry shown here—specifically defined by a vwl_service ID—classifies it fundamentally as an SD-WAN rule, regardless of the destination object.

C (An SD-WAN rule): The presence of vwl_service and vwl_mbr_seq (SD-WAN member sequence) definitively identifies this entry as a rule generated by the SD-WAN subsystem.

Conclusion: The output shows a route controlled by the SD-WAN engine (vwl), confirming it is an SD-WAN rule.

The correct answers are A, D, and E . This is a feasible path RPF check scenario. In FortiGate’s default RPF behavior, FortiGate checks whether the routing table contains a valid return route to the source IP address through the same interface on which the packet arrived . The study guide’s RPF feasible path example states that FortiGate “checks the routing table for a route that matches the source address and incoming interface of the first original packet.” It then gives the exact result: User A passes because “there is a default route through wan1,” so packets received on wan1 pass the RPF check regardless of source address. User B fails because FortiGate does not have a route to 95.56.234.24 through wan2 . User C fails because FortiGate does not have a route to 10.0.4.63 through port1 . Therefore, option B is wrong because FortiGate is not allowing asymmetric return routing here. Option C is wrong because the default route points out wan1 , not port1 , so it cannot validate User C’s packet arriving on port1.

The correct answer is A .

The study guide explicitly explains the diagnose debug rating table and says that for each server IP, the output shows “The round trip delay”

That means the RTT value represents the time it takes for FortiGate to send a request and receive the reply from that FortiGuard server.

The FortiOS administration guide also confirms this by stating:

“Each server is probed for Round Trip Time (RTT) every two minutes.”

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because packet loss is shown separately by Curr Lost and Total Lost , while RTT is the round-trip delay

C is wrong because license-validation behavior is indicated by flags such as I = Initial , not by the RTT value itself

D is wrong because the documents do not say RTT starts at a fixed value of 10; it is measured dynamically as round-trip delay

So the verified answer is: A .

According to the official Fortinet documentation (Technical Tip: Useful FSSO Commands), heartbeat messages play a crucial role in communication between the FSSO Collector Agent and FortiGate. These messages are regularly sent from the Collector Agent to verify its status, maintain session awareness, and confirm connectivity between the authentication infrastructure and FortiGate appliances.

Option B is confirmed by Fortinet, as the collector agent logs on Windows or its management console will specifically note heartbeat events, connection status, and any issues maintaining contact with FortiGate units.

Option C is validated by both official CLI documentation and the technical tip linked. On FortiGate, heartbeat messages from the collector agent are visible using real-time debug tools such as diagnose debug application authd or FSSO-specific commands. These enable administrators to monitor live logon states, session status, and connection health directly from the FortiGate CLI. The debug stream shows heartbeats received and their effect on active logons, associating health monitoring with active sessions.

Heartbeat operation is fully automated once FSSO is set up—there is no requirement for manual enablement or configuration, aligning with Fortinet’s philosophy of seamless integration and centralized management across the Security Fabric. This ensures that both FortiGate and the collector agent can quickly and reliably detect any miscommunication or outage, addressing authentication issues proactively.