VMware 2V0-17.25 VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Administrator Exam Practice Test

Resetting identity management in VCF requires removal of existing identity configurations, including external identity providers and the Identity Broker configuration. The VCF documentation states that to reset identity services, administrators must remove the SSO configuration, including broker settings, and then reconfigure SSO.

Option B ensures complete cleanup of identity integrations.

Option C re-establishes identity management with the correct configuration.

Disabling (D) or reverting (E) is not a supported reset method. Leaving provisioned users/groups (A) would not fully reset identity management.

The VCF 9.0 Service Mesh Integration Guide defines Istio as: “Istio Service Mesh provides an infrastructure layer that transparently handles service-to-service communication, securing, observing, and controlling traffic between microservices.” The key purpose is enabling structured and observable communication between applications. While Istio includes discovery and load balancing, those are features, not the overarching purpose. A centralized routing table (Option D) is not the core definition. VMware documentation highlights Istio’s role in service-to-service communication, observability, and policy enforcement within the service mesh. Therefore, the correct answer is B.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The VCF Automation Networking Guide (9.0) documents that when an Organization for All Applications is created, networking constructs are provisioned automatically to provide immediate connectivity. Specifically, “During region creation, the system automatically deploys a Default VPC, a Provider Tier-0 Gateway, a VPC connectivity profile, and default SNAT rules to enable outbound access.” .

DNAT rules are not provisioned by default (they must be configured for inbound services). Likewise, NSX Transit Gateway is a multi-region design element, not automatically deployed for a single org setup. A VDS is a vSphere construct and not part of the NSX automation performed at this stage. Therefore, the automatically created items are: Default VPC (A), Provider Tier-0 Gateway (B), SNAT rule (E), and VPC Connectivity Profile (G).

The VCF 9.0 Installation Guide describes the VCF Download Tool for dark sites:

“For environments without Internet access, use the VCF Download Tool on a connected machine to download required bundles and transfer them to the air-gapped VCF environment.”

Broadcom Downloads (B) is the source but not the workflow for dark sites. The VCF Installer (C) consumes binaries but does not fetch them. SDDC Manager (D) manages bundles in connected mode but cannot download in disconnected environments.

Thus, the correct method for dark sites is A. Use the VCF Download Tool.

VCF provides integrated automation and orchestration for Day 0–2 operations, including networking: VCF is a “full-stack IaaS” with “automation and orchestration to simplify Day 0, Day 1, and Day 2 tasks.” VCF supports modern apps: users can provision “VMs” and “Kubernetes workloads” from self-service services, proving both VM and container support. Multi-tenancy with strong isolation is native: Organizations are “secure and isolated” boundaries; All Apps organizations run “virtual machines (VMs), Kubernetes… multiple tenants with secure infrastructure isolation.”

Incorrect choices: VCF is not limited to vSAN only (supports VMFS/NFS/CNS as documented elsewhere) and does not rely on manual scalability—automation is core. Compliance is provided within the private cloud, not only by a CSP.

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, certificate replacement procedures for components such as:

vCenter Server

NSX Manager

SDDC Manager

Aria Suite components

require certificates to be provided in PEM format.

From the VCF 9.0 documentation under Certificate Management:

“When replacing certificates with CA-signed certificates, provide the certificate and private key in PEM format.”

Additionally:

“The certificate file must include the full chain (server certificate and intermediate certificates) in PEM encoding.”

Why PEM?

PEM format:

Base64 encoded

Human-readable

Common format for VMware components

Required for SDDC Manager certificate import workflows

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. PFX (PKCS#12)Contains private key and certificate bundled together; not the required format for VCF certificate replacement workflows.

B. DERBinary format; VMware Cloud Foundation certificate workflows require Base64 PEM format.

D. P7B (PKCS#7)Does not contain private key; unsuitable for certificate replacement.

Document References (VCF 9.0)

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Security and Certificate Management

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Replace Certificates with CA-Signed Certificates

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Certificate Requirements and Formats

The documentation clarifies the scenario when a password is changed outside of VCF Operations: “When an error occurs, for example after a password expires, you must manually reset the password in the component product. After you reset the password in a component, you must remediate the password in VCF Operations.” “Password Rotation” is different—it “allows you to orchestrate the rotation” of stored credentials (a planned, VCF-driven change), not reconcile an externally altered password. Therefore, after the direct password change in vCenter, the correct recovery step in VCF Operations is to use Remediate password to synchronize credentials and restore management from VCF Operations.

===========

The VCF 9.0 Automation Guide – Content Sharing Policies describes how to control catalog item visibility. Administrators create Content Sharing Policies to restrict which groups can see specific catalog items.

Steps required for this scenario:

Create a new Content Sharing Policy (D): This policy governs catalog item access.

Add the catalog item to the new policy (B): The Mobile Application Backend blueprint must be explicitly added.

Configure the scope as Project → FitnessTrackerApp (C): This ensures the catalog restriction applies only within the FitnessTrackerApp project.

Add the FTA_LeadDevelopers Group (F): Grants visibility only to this group, fulfilling the requirement that only Lead Developers initially see the item.

Incorrect options:

Deployment Limit Policy (A) controls resource limits, not catalog visibility.

FTA_Developers (E) should not be included, as the requirement is Lead Developers only.

Organization scope (G) would expose the item to all projects, which violates the requirement.

Thus, the administrator must configure a Content Sharing Policy, add the catalog item, scope it to the FitnessTrackerApp project, and restrict it to the Lead Developers group.

Document reference (VCF 9.0):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Observability and Monitoring Architecture

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → VCF Operations and VCF Operations for Logs

In VMware Cloud Foundation, lifecycle management boundaries are defined at the workload domain level. If independent lifecycle and scaling control is required, the cluster must be deployed as a separate workload domain.

VCF 9.0 supports workload domains that either:

Use a dedicated NSX instance, or

Share an existing NSX Manager instance.

Because the requirement only states independent lifecycle and scaling (not network isolation), the correct and efficient approach is to:

Deploy the new cluster as a new workload domain with shared NSX.

Deploying within an existing workload domain (A or B) would tie lifecycle operations together.

Deploying with a new NSX instance (C) is unnecessary unless full NSX isolation is required.

Thus, the correct action is D.

When converging an existing vSphere cluster into a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Fleet, the cluster must already be a functional vSphere environment. According to the VCF 9.0 Convergence Guide, the minimum prerequisites for convergence include:

A deployed and operational vCenter Server managing the cluster.

ESXi (VMware ESX) hosts installed and joined to that vCenter cluster.

The documentation states:

“The vSphere environment to be converged must consist of ESXi hosts managed by a supported vCenter Server instance.”

NSX (C) is not required before convergence because NSX is deployed and configured as part of the VCF bring-up or workload domain conversion process.

VCF Operations (D) is not a prerequisite for cluster convergence.

vSAN (E) is optional because VCF supports multiple principal storage types (vSAN, VMFS, NFS).

Therefore, the required components that must exist prior to convergence are VMware ESX hosts and VMware vCenter Server.

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 9.0, the governance of Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) allows for granular control over networking parameters. When a VPC is created in VCF 9.0, a VPC Connectivity Profile is automatically generated specifically for that instance if a pre-existing shared profile is not selected.

According to the VCF 9.0 Administration Guide (Networking Section):

VPC Isolation: Each NSX VPC serves as a distinct, isolated administrative and data plane boundary. While multiple VPCs can reside within a single NSX Project, their configurations—including the connectivity profiles—can be managed independently.

Profile Modification Impact: When an administrator edits the NSX Connectivity profile for a specific NSX Project and VPC, the system treats this as a targeted configuration update. Because the profile in this scenario was "generated automatically when the NSX VPC was created," it is uniquely associated with that specific VPC's lifecycle.

Scoped Changes: Modifying this specific profile does not trigger a global update across the entire VCF Automation organization, nor does it affect other VPCs within the project that may be using their own automatically generated or distinct profiles. This ensures that changes to one tenant's or application's networking environment do not cause unintended disruptions to others.

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, network security and segment integrity are maintained through Segment Security Profiles. These profiles are applied to NSX segments to define what type of traffic is permitted to originate from or be received by the virtual machines attached to that segment.

According to the VCF 9.0 (NSX) Networking and Security Guide:

The Default Segment Security Profile is designed with a "Zero Trust" approach for foundational services. One of its key default settings is DHCP Server Block, which is set to Yes. This is a security measure to prevent "rogue" DHCP servers from being accidentally or maliciously connected to a segment and disrupting the network by handing out unauthorized IP addresses.

When an administrator intentionally places a legitimate DHCP server on a segment:

Segment Security Profile: The "DHCP Server Block" feature resides specifically within the Segment Security Profile, not the IP Discovery profile (which handles how NSX learns IP addresses via ARP/DHCP snooping).

Cloning vs. Editing: In VCF 9.0, the "Default" profiles are system-defined. While some default settings can be edited in certain versions, the architectural best practice and documented procedure for production environments is to Clone the default profile. This creates a custom profile where the DHCP Server Block can be set to No, allowing the DHCP server's "Offer" and "ACK" packets to pass through the segment.

Application: Once the cloned profile is modified, it must be manually applied to the specific segment where the virtual desktops and the DHCP server reside.

The VCF 9.0 Operations Documentation identifies Operations for Networks as the key enabler for the Network Operations feature:

“VCF Operations for Networks (formerly vRNI) provides visibility into network traffic flows, NSX fabric health, application dependency mapping, and micro-segmentation planning. It integrates directly into VCF Operations dashboards under Network Operations.”

The vDefend firewall is unrelated, as it provides workload-level security. The VCF Operations Collector is required for telemetry ingestion but does not provide full Network Operations. NSX itself provides the underlying virtual networking, but it must be monitored through VCF Operations for Networks. Therefore, the correct answer is VCF Operations for Networks.

To enable the visibility of audit events within the VCF Operations interface, the environment must satisfy specific deployment and configuration prerequisites. Without these steps, audit event information will not be populated.

According to the documentation:

Install VCF Operations for Logs (E): If you have not configured VCF Operations, you will not see any information related to audit events. Therefore, you must install VCF Operations for Logs first.

Configure vCenter Server instances in VCF Operations for Logs (D): You must register the vCenter Server instances in VCF Operations for Logs to ensure the management components are sending the necessary log data to the ingestion engine.

Configure VCF Operations for Logs Integration in VCF Operations (F): After you install VCF Operations for Logs, you must configure the VCF Operations for Logs management pack from the Administration > Integrations page in VCF Operations. This includes configuring the VCF Operations for Logs instances which forward logs to the specific VCF Operations for Logs instance that is integrated with VCF Operations.

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 9.0, the licensing architecture has undergone a fundamental shift to simplify the management of large-scale deployments. The legacy method of managing individual 25-character license keys for every component (ESXi, vCenter, NSX, etc.) has been replaced by a unified, subscription-based License File model managed through VCF Operations.

According to the VCF 9.0 Licensing and Administration Guide:

Register the VCF Operations instance with the VCF Business Services console (B): This is the mandatory first step. VCF Operations must be linked to the cloud-based VCF Business Services console (vcf.broadcom.com). This registration allows the environment to sync entitlements and report usage.

Add the license file from the VCF Business Services console to VCF Operations (A): Unlike previous versions that used keys, VCF 9.0 utilizes a "Secure License File" (or an activation code that retrieves it). For environments without direct internet access (Disconnected Mode), the administrator must manually download this file from the Business Services console and upload it to the VCF Operations interface.

Assign licenses to vCenter instances from VCF Operations (F): Once the license file is added to VCF Operations, the "pool" of capacity (measured in Cores or TiBs) becomes available. The administrator then assigns the license specifically to the vCenter Server instances. Documentation states: "License your vCenter, ESX hosts, NSX, VCF Operations, and other components by assigning the license to the vCenter instance." The vCenter then automatically handles the downstream entitlement for the hosts and integrated services.

Why other options are incorrect:

C: While NSX is licensed as part of the fleet, the administrative action in VCF 9.0 is to assign the license to the vCenter instance, which then licenses the "connected assets."

D & E: VCF 9.0 specifically "eliminates the need to manage multiple license keys" (except for certain legacy add-ons). The core fleet licensing uses a single License File rather than individual keys for every component.

To deploy Kubernetes workloads through VCF Automation (Organization for All Applications), the following prerequisites are required:

vSphere Supervisor must be activated within the workload domain (B) to enable Kubernetes functionality.

A Region must be configured (A) to provide compute and storage capacity to the Organization.

NSX Federation (C) is optional and not required.

VKS activation in the Management domain (D, E) is not required for workload domain Kubernetes deployments.

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 9.0, the VCF Service Broker is the component responsible for providing a self-service catalog of available services, blueprints, and content to end users in the VM Apps tenant. The documentation explains:

“Service Broker acts as the catalog service for VM-based and cloud-native applications, allowing organizations to expose curated content to end users while applying policies, constraints, and governance.”

VCF Operations Orchestrator (A) provides workflow automation but does not expose services directly in a self-service catalog.

VCF Assembler (B) is used for designing blueprints and application templates but not for publishing them to end users.

VCF Config (D) is responsible for infrastructure configuration management and desired state compliance, not catalog services.

Thus, the correct component for the catalog is the VCF Service Broker.

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, pricing policies are configured within VCF Operations (Costing and Chargeback).

From the VCF 9.0 documentation under Cost and Chargeback Configuration:

“Base Settings define the default cost drivers for CPU, memory, and storage that apply across clusters unless overridden by a custom policy.”

To meet the requirement:

CPU, memory, and storage pricing must be identical across all clusters.

A new policy named Resources must be created and applied globally.

Thus:

1️⃣ Create a new policy under Base Settings for resource cost (Option A)

This satisfies:

Same CPU, memory, and storage cost across clusters.

From the documentation regarding policy hierarchy:

“When a custom cost policy is set as default, it applies to all objects that do not have a more specific policy assigned.”

2️⃣ Set “Resources” as the default policy (Option E)

This ensures:

All clusters inherit this pricing model.

Other unspecified settings fall back to default behavior.

From documentation regarding overrides:

“Specific object types such as clusters can have additional cost components defined through child policies that override parent policy settings.”

3️⃣ Create a child policy under “Resources” for SAP HANA cluster VM setup charges (Option F)

This satisfies:

VM setup charges applied only to SAP HANA cluster.

Other clusters remain unaffected.

All other settings remain default.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

B – Setting Default Policy as default contradicts requirement to create a new named policy “Resources.”

C – VM setup charges should not be in Base Settings (would apply globally).

D – Incorrect hierarchy; policies are structured under custom policy trees, not under “Default Policy” in this context.

Document References (VCF 9.0):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → VCF Operations → Costing and Chargeback

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Policy Inheritance and Overrides

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 → Base Settings and Custom Cost Policies

The requirement is to ensure DNS records are created only when a domain name is provided.

Since the blueprint includes a custom property for domainName, the correct conditional logic in the event subscription must validate that this property is not null.

Adding the condition:

event.data.customProperties['domainName'] != null

ensures the workflow executes only when the domain name is provided.

Option B validates hostname instead of domain name.

Option A controls workflow blocking, not conditional execution.

Option C relates to cleanup, not creation condition validation.

Deleting an Organization in VCF Automation requires using the Provider Management Portal, not Fleet Management. Before deletion, dependent resources must be removed.

According to the VCF 9.0 Automation documentation:

Administrators must log into the VCF Automation Provider Management Portal (G).

The Organization must first be disabled (C) to prevent active usage.

All associated region quotas must be deleted (D), since Organizations cannot be removed while resource allocations exist.

Finally, the administrator can delete the Organization (A).

Deleting SSL certificates (B) and the embedded Orchestrator (F) are not required for Organization removal. Fleet Management (E) is unrelated to Organization lifecycle operations.

The vSAN ESA documentation in VCF 9.0 explains that auto-policy management dynamically selects the most efficient data placement policy based on cluster size. For RAID-6 (erasure coding with double parity), the minimum required host count is 6. The docs state:

“RAID-6 (Erasure Coding with FTT=2) requires a minimum of six hosts in a vSAN ESA cluster. This ensures that data and parity components can be distributed across unique failure domains.”

With fewer than six hosts, RAID-6 cannot be enforced and auto-policy management will fall back to RAID-1 mirroring. RAID-6 in vSAN ESA provides higher storage efficiency but comes with stricter host count requirements. Options 2 and 4 are far below requirements, while 8 provides more redundancy but is not the minimum. Therefore, the correct minimum number of hosts for RAID-6 with ESA is 6.

vSphere Supervisor leverages the Cluster API (CAPI) open-source project to manage the lifecycle of Kubernetes clusters.

Cluster API provides declarative APIs to create, scale, upgrade, and manage Kubernetes clusters. The VMware documentation states:

“VMware Kubernetes Service uses Cluster API components to provision and manage Tanzu Kubernetes clusters on vSphere.”

Incorrect options:

Kubeadm (A) is a Kubernetes bootstrap tool but not the lifecycle engine used by Supervisor.

Contour (B) is an ingress controller.

Grafana (C) is a visualization and monitoring tool.

Thus, the correct answer is Cluster API.

VCF 9.0 documents two Operations for Logs/Operations models—Simple (Standard) and High Availability (Cluster)—and highlight that Simple is the minimal footprint option intended for test/dev: “Architecture flexibility: Can be deployed in a Simple or Highly Available Cluster deployment. Recommended deployment is a HA Cluster… Simple deployment is for test/dev environments, it is not for production use cases.”

By contrast, HA/clustered models increase resources to provide redundancy at scale. Since the requirement is the smallest resource footprint, the Simple model is the correct selection. (Stretched/Continuous Availability options are not listed VCF Operations models in this context.)

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, when deploying vSphere Supervisor (formerly part of Tanzu) specifically with VMware NSX as the networking provider, the architecture relies on the high-performance routing capabilities of the NSX fabric.

According to the VCF 9.0 Developer Ready Infrastructure Guide:

When NSX is selected as the networking stack for the Supervisor, the system utilizes Distributed Gateways (T1) to handle the routing for the supervisor's internal and external traffic.

Distributed Gateway (C): In an NSX-integrated Supervisor deployment, the East-West traffic and the localized routing for the Kubernetes Control Plane and Pod networking are handled by the Distributed Gateway. This ensures that routing occurs at the host level (kernel space) where possible, minimizing latency and "hairpinning" to a centralized edge node.

Why others are incorrect: * Avi Load Balancer (A): While Avi (NSX Advanced Load Balancer) is the preferred load balancer for VCF 9.0, the question asks for the "networking connectivity type" for the Supervisor deployment itself. Avi provides the Load Balancing service (ingress/egress), but the underlying routing connectivity type is the Distributed Gateway.

Data Network Subnet (B): This is a general networking term and not a specific "connectivity type" construct within the NSX Supervisor deployment workflow.

Centralized Gateway (D): While a Tier-0/Tier-1 gateway can have centralized services (like NAT or Statefull Firewall), the standard connectivity model for Supervisor namespaces to maintain performance and scale across the VCF hosts is the Distributed Gateway.

https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-cis/vcf/vcf-9-0-and-later/9-0/building-your-private-cloud-infrastructure/managing-network-connectivity-in-vcenter/managing-distributed-network-connectivity.html

The VCF Health feature “provides a central location for monitoring the health of your environment,” including the ability to track “vCenter Server instances,” “ESXi hosts,” and “NSX deployments.” Health monitoring includes connectivity, configuration, and critical services status, surfacing alerts for remediation. The documentation’s scope statements make clear that VCF Health targets the infrastructure components—vCenter, ESXi, and NSX—rather than the VCF Operations applications themselves (for example, Fleet Management or Logs). Therefore, the correct monitored components are ESX hosts, vCenter Server, and NSX.

Per the VCF 9.0 Automation Provider Management Guide:

Supervisor Activation: “Kubernetes-based workloads require Supervisor to be enabled in the Management Domain before deploying organizations.”

Region Configuration: “Organizations for All Applications must be deployed into a preconfigured Region, defined in the Provider Management Portal.”NSX Federation (D) is optional for multi-site deployments. Supervisor is not activated in workload domains (B) but centrally in the management domain. VMware Kubernetes Service (E) is enabled per tenant but not required before Organization creation. Thus, correct prerequisites are A and C.

According to the VCF 9.0 Operations and Monitoring Guide:

Fleet Management: “VCF Operations Fleet Management enables cross-instance monitoring, unifying health and metrics across multiple VCF instances.”

Operations for Networks: “Provides application and network visibility, dependency mapping, and traffic analytics. Required to complete full-stack monitoring.”

Core VCF Operations is already deployed as part of the management stack and does not need to be added separately. Operations for Logs is optional for log aggregation, not mandatory for full-stack observability. The Management Pack Builder (C) is an add-on tool for custom packs, not a required component. Therefore, the correct two to add for full-stack monitoring are VCF Operations Fleet Management (A) and VCF Operations for Networks (E).