Scaled Agile SSM SSM (6.0) - SAFe Scrum Master Practice 6.0 Exam Practice Test

One recommended practice for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when coaching teams on presenting a draft plan at PI Planning is to align on how the team will answer questions about their proposed objectives. This practice helps the team to prepare for the feedback and input they will receive from the business owners, product management, and other teams and stakeholders during the draft plan review. The team should agree on who will present the objectives, how they will explain the business value and technical feasibility, and how they will handle any objections or concerns. The team should also rehearse their presentation and anticipate potential questions and scenarios. By aligning on how to answer questions, the team can increase their confidence and clarity, and demonstrate their commitment and alignment to the vision and goals of the ART.

An effective Scrum Master/Team Coach (SM/TC) not only supports the team’s daily operations but also helps them grow and improve over time. Thinking beyond the day-to-day means guiding the team toward strategic improvement and long-term effectiveness, not just tactical task completion.

By helping the team prioritize improvement activities to ensure progress, Scrum Masters promote a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation. This aligns with SAFe’s Relentless Improvement pillar, encouraging the team to use metrics, feedback, and retrospectives to drive sustained enhancement in flow, quality, and collaboration.

From SAFe guidance:

“Scrum Masters help teams improve continuously by identifying, prioritizing, and pursuing improvement opportunities that enhance value delivery and team performance.”

Thus, the correct answer is D. Help the team prioritize improvement activities to ensure progress, as this demonstrates strategic thinking beyond daily coordination.

According to the SAFe 6 Scrum Master documentation, one of the traits of a servant leader is to persuade rather than use authority. This means that the servant leader influences others by appealing to their values, beliefs, and interests, rather than by imposing their own will or position. By persuading rather than using authority, the servant leader fosters a culture of collaboration, empowerment, and trust, where team members are more likely to accept and welcome coaching, feedback, and change. Persuasion also helps the servant leader to align the team with the organization’s vision, mission, and goals, and to create a shared understanding of the purpose and value of the work.

One way uncommitted objectives help Agile Teams make a plan for the PI is that they maintain the predictability of achieving the objectives. Uncommitted objectives are PI objectives that are not included in the team’s commitment or counted against teams in the ART predictability measure. They are used to identify work that can be variable within the scope of a PI, such as stretch goals, spikes, innovation, or exploration1 Uncommitted objectives help improve the predictability of delivering business value since they allow the team to adjust their scope based on the actual progress and feedback during the PI. They also provide the team with some flexibility and capacity to respond to changing needs and expectations, as well as to pursue learning and improvement opportunities12 

According to the SAFe® Iteration Review process (adapted from Scrum’s Sprint Review), the primary goal is to inspect the completed increment and gather feedback from stakeholders. This event focuses on demonstrating working software or system increments produced during the iteration. The team and stakeholders then discuss what was accomplished, any changes in priorities, and what might be done next to ensure continuous alignment with business needs.

The Iteration Review is not about planning or adding new acceptance criteria (which happens during refinement) nor about demonstrating work from a previous PI. Instead, it’s about validating the current increment and using feedback to adjust the upcoming work accordingly.

From SAFe guidance:

“The Iteration Review provides a mechanism for the team to demonstrate the increment to stakeholders and collect feedback. This feedback helps ensure that the team continues to deliver value aligned with customer needs.”

Therefore, the correct answer is D. To receive feedback on the increment, as this is the key objective of the Iteration Review.

According to SAFe, one output of a successful Iteration Retrospective is the creation of a few improvement Stories that enter the Team Backlog for the next iteration. These stories reflect the team’s agreement on what they can do better in terms of their process, practices, and performance. The improvement stories are visible and prioritized along with the other stories in the backlog. They help the team implement the concept of relentless improvement, which is one of the core values of SAFe.

One of the recommended practices for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when facilitating Iteration Review is to begin to consider how and what to demo in Iteration Planning. This helps the team to have a clear vision of the expected outcome and to align their work with the iteration goals. It also facilitates the preparation and execution of the demo, as the team can anticipate the feedback and questions from the stakeholders.

One way to ensure a team is holding successful iteration reviews and demos is to have the team demo working, tested system components that meet the definition of done (DoD). This shows the team’s progress and value delivery, and allows them to receive feedback from the product owner and other stakeholders. The team should minimize the use of slides and the preparation time for the demos, and focus on the solution instead of the presentation. The team should also discuss the impact of the current solution on the nonfunctional requirements (NFRs) and identify any risks or impediments.

One purpose of iteration goals is to align team members to a common purpose and vision. Iteration goals are a high-level summary of the business and technical goals that an Agile Team agrees to accomplish in an iteration. They help the team and the product owner to reach agreement on the business value they intend to deliver, align their work to their team PI objectives, and ground everyone on their shared purpose. Iteration goals also provide transparency and management information, as well as support the coordination and dependency management of the Agile Release Train (ART).

Backlog Refinement is the Agile Team event where team members estimate relative story sizes. Backlog Refinement is an ongoing process where the team collaborates with the Product Owner and other stakeholders to review, split, prioritize, and estimate the stories in the Team Backlog1 One of the main objectives of Backlog Refinement is to ensure that the stories are ready for Iteration Planning, which means they are clear, feasible, testable, and small enough to be completed in a single iteration2 To achieve this, the team uses relative story sizing, which is a technique to compare the effort, complexity, and uncertainty of different stories based on a common reference point3 Relative story sizing helps the team to create a consistent and shared understanding of the scope and value of the work, as well as to optimize the flow and predictability of the delivery process4 The team can use various methods to estimate relative story sizes, such as story points, T-shirt sizes, or Fibonacci numbers35 

One benefit of having an IP Iteration every PI is that it creates an estimating buffer for meeting PI objectives. PI objectives are a set of SMART goals that align the teams and stakeholders to a common vision and mission for the upcoming Program Increment (PI). They are derived from the business context, priorities, and dependencies, and are agreed upon and committed by the teams during PI Planning1 However, since PI objectives are based on estimates and assumptions, there is always a degree of uncertainty and variability in the delivery process. To account for this, SAFe recommends that teams reserve 10% of their capacity for each PI as an estimating buffer. This buffer is used during the IP Iteration, which is a unique, dedicated iteration that occurs every PI and provides dedicated time for innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt events2 By having an IP Iteration as an estimating buffer, the teams can improve the predictability and flow of value delivery, as well as reduce the stress and pressure of meeting the PI objectives23 

The “C” in the CALMR approach to DevOps stands for culture, which is the foundation of successful DevOps adoption. Culture refers to the values, beliefs, and behaviors that guide the collaboration and alignment of everyone in the value stream. By creating a culture of shared responsibility, teams can manage the tensions caused by differing needs, such as speed, quality, security, and stability. A culture of shared responsibility means that everyone is accountable for the outcomes of their work, and that they work together to deliver value to the customers. It also means that teams respect each other’s roles and expertise, and seek feedback and learning opportunities. A culture of shared responsibility fosters trust, transparency, and continuous improvement, which are essential for DevOps.

Improving flow is a central responsibility of a Scrum Master/Team Coach (SM/TC) in SAFe®. One of the most effective ways to enhance flow is by establishing a Team Kanban board with the team.

A Kanban board visualizes the workflow, showing where work items are in the process and helping teams identify bottlenecks or work-in-progress (WIP) issues. By visualizing flow, the team can inspect, measure, and optimize how work moves from “To Do” to “Done.”

This approach aligns with SAFe’s Principle #6: Visualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengths, which promotes smoother, faster delivery and higher predictability.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams use Kanban systems to visualize work, identify bottlenecks, and optimize flow. Scrum Masters/Team Coaches help teams establish and maintain their Kanban to improve throughput and reduce delays.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Work with team members to establish a team Kanban board, as it directly enables better visibility and flow management.

According to SAFe®, Agile Teams should maintain 2–3 iterations’ worth of refined Stories in their team backlog. This ensures a steady flow of ready work without excessive upfront planning, preserving adaptability while avoiding delays caused by unrefined items.

Maintaining this level of refinement allows the team to respond effectively to changing priorities, dependencies, or feedback from stakeholders while ensuring that upcoming iterations are well-prepared. Refinement sessions are typically ongoing and collaborative, focusing on breaking down larger items into ready Stories with clear acceptance criteria.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams continuously refine their backlog to maintain 2–3 iterations of ready stories. This supports continuous flow and readiness for iteration planning.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. 2–3 Iterations of refined Stories.

In SAFe®, the Inspect and Adapt (I&A) event provides the Agile Release Train (ART) with a structured opportunity to reflect, measure progress, and identify systemic improvements. The Scrum Master/Team Coach (SM/TC) plays a critical role in supporting this event by ensuring that each team’s contribution is backed by meaningful, accurate data.

Providing team data—such as iteration metrics, team velocity, predictability, and performance against objectives—enables evidence-based discussions during the quantitative and qualitative measurement portion of the I&A. This transparency helps identify trends, validate outcomes, and support root cause analysis during the problem-solving workshop.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams prepare quantitative and qualitative data for the Inspect and Adapt to provide objective insights into their performance and enable continuous improvement discussions.”

Thus, the correct answer is C. Provide team data, as it directly supports the empirical foundation of the I&A event.

Hackathons are one of the activities that can be done during the IP Iteration to foster innovation and learning. They allow the team members to work on whatever they want, with whomever they want, as long as the work reflects the mission of the company. The teams then demo their work to others at the end of the hackathon. Hackathons can help the team explore new ideas, technologies, and solutions that can benefit the business and the customers. They can also increase the team’s engagement, creativity, and collaboration. References: Innovation and Planning Iteration - Scaled Agile Framework, Exam Study Guide: SSM (6.0) - SAFe® Scrum Master

One of the best practices Scrum Masters/Team Coaches can use to run successful meetings is to leave meetings with clear action items. Action items are specific tasks that need to be done by a certain person or group by a certain deadline. They help the team to follow up on the outcomes of the meeting, track progress, and ensure accountability. Action items should be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Scrum Masters/Team Coaches should document and communicate the action items to the team and stakeholders, and review them in the next meeting.

SAFe® defines seven core competencies that enable business agility. One of these is Agile Product Delivery, which focuses on building a customer-centric approach to defining, developing, and releasing valuable solutions.

This competency emphasizes Design Thinking, DevOps, continuous delivery, and release on demand to ensure fast, high-quality value delivery aligned with customer needs. While Built-in Quality is a foundational SAFe principle, it is not categorized as a core competency.

From SAFe guidance:

“Agile Product Delivery is a customer-centric approach to defining, building, and releasing a continuous flow of valuable products and services to customers and users.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Agile Product Delivery, as it is one of SAFe’s official seven core competencies.

In SAFe® and Scrum, acceptance criteria define the conditions that must be met for a User Story to be considered complete and accepted by the Product Owner. These criteria clarify how the Story will be validated and serve as the basis for confirming that functionality meets expectations and quality standards.

Acceptance criteria support transparency, alignment, and shared understanding between the team and stakeholders. They guide development, testing, and validation efforts and are essential for achieving the Definition of Done (DoD).

From SAFe guidance:

“Acceptance criteria define the boundaries and validation conditions of a Story. They ensure the implemented functionality meets the customer’s intent and can be accepted.”

Therefore, the correct answer is A. To identify how the Story can be validated, as this captures the core purpose of acceptance criteria.

Respect is one of the five Scrum values that can help Agile Teams create transparency. Respect means that team members value each other’s opinions, skills, and contributions, and treat each other with dignity and professionalism. Respect also means that team members are honest and open with each other, and share information and feedback without hiding or withholding anything. By respecting each other, Agile Teams can foster a culture of trust and collaboration, where everyone feels comfortable to express their ideas, concerns, and issues, and work together to solve them. Transparency is essential for Agile Teams to inspect and adapt their work, and to align their actions with the vision and goals of the organization.

According to the SAFe 6 Scrum Master documentation, one of the elements on the Scrum Master/Team Coach responsibility wheel is to facilitate PI Planning. PI Planning is a two-day event where all the teams and stakeholders of an Agile Release Train (ART) collaborate to align on a common vision, define and commit to the PI objectives, and identify and manage risks and dependencies. The Scrum Master/Team Coach facilitates PI Planning by 1:

Helping the team prepare for the event, such as reviewing the business context, vision, and backlog, and creating draft plans

Supporting the team during the event, such as facilitating breakout sessions, resolving issues, and ensuring alignment and collaboration with other teams

Assisting the team after the event, such as finalizing the plans, updating the PI board, and conducting a retrospective

Facilitating PI Planning is one of the ways the Scrum Master/Team Coach helps the team and the ART achieve their goals and deliver value.

The Iteration Retrospective is a core event in SAFe® and Scrum where the team reflects on the past iteration to identify ways to improve processes, collaboration, and effectiveness. One of the most powerful ways to transform retrospective insights into action is by writing improvement Stories.

An improvement Story is treated like any other backlog item—it is estimated, prioritized, and included in the upcoming iteration backlog to ensure continuous, measurable progress toward higher performance. This approach aligns with SAFe’s focus on Relentless Improvement, a pillar of the SAFe House of Lean.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams record improvement items as stories and include them in the next iteration backlog. This ensures that improvement work receives visibility, commitment, and action.”

Thus, the correct answer is B. By writing improvement Stories, as it ensures improvement actions are tangible, trackable, and continuously implemented.

An anti-pattern is a behavior that seems helpful but actually undermines Agile principles. In the context of Iteration Retrospectives, one anti-pattern for Scrum Masters or Team Coaches is focusing only on what to improve and not on what to preserve.

Effective retrospectives are balanced—they highlight both what went well and what can be improved. Recognizing and reinforcing successful practices helps the team sustain productive behaviors while targeting specific areas for change. Ignoring positive aspects can lower morale and overlook practices that contribute to success.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams use the retrospective to discuss what went well, what didn’t, and what actions to take. Recognizing what to preserve reinforces effective team habits and strengths.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. They focus only on what to improve and not what to preserve, as this behavior disrupts balanced reflection and continuous improvement.

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe®), Scrum Masters or Team Coaches (SM/TCs) support their teams by making work visible and ensuring transparency around progress and delivery. One of the most effective tools for visualizing team delivery is the Burn-up Chart.

A Burn-up Chart shows progress toward the completion of work over time. It tracks the amount of work completed compared to the total scope, helping teams and stakeholders visualize how close they are to meeting iteration or PI objectives. This visualization enables data-driven discussions, supports predictability, and helps identify delivery risks early.

While other metrics like Cycle Time or Cumulative Flow Diagrams are valuable for measuring flow and efficiency, the Burn-up Chart specifically visualizes delivery progress.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams use burn-up charts to visualize progress toward the goal and communicate delivery status. They enable transparency and support empirical planning and adaptation.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Burn-up chart—it is the primary visualization tool for tracking and communicating team delivery progress.

One way a Scrum Master/Team Coach can support productive team Backlog Refinement sessions is to ensure subject matter experts are invited. Subject matter experts (SMEs) are people who have specialized knowledge or skills related to the domain or technical aspects of the product or solution. They can provide valuable input and feedback to the team during Backlog Refinement, such as clarifying requirements, validating assumptions, identifying dependencies, and suggesting solutions. SMEs can also help the team to split, estimate, and prioritize the backlog items more effectively and accurately. By inviting SMEs to the Backlog Refinement sessions, the Scrum Master/Team Coach can facilitate better collaboration, communication, and alignment among the team and the stakeholders.

In SAFe®, the Iteration Review is the event where the Agile Team measures and demonstrates the outcome of the iteration. The team reviews the completed work, compares it against the iteration goals, and gathers feedback from stakeholders.

This review allows the team to assess whether the iteration delivered the intended value and identify areas for improvement in future iterations. The focus is on transparency, empirical measurement, and alignment to customer needs.

From SAFe guidance:

“The Iteration Review provides the opportunity for the team to demonstrate the increment, measure progress toward iteration goals, and collect feedback.”

Thus, the correct answer is A. The Iteration Review, as it specifically measures the outcome of the iteration and validates progress.

One benefit of holding regular system demos is that execution can be measured across the whole ART. A system demo is a significant event that provides an integrated view of new Features for the most recent Iteration delivered by all the teams in the Agile Release Train (ART). Each demo gives ART stakeholders an objective measure of progress during a Program Increment (PI). The system demo offers the ART a fact-based measure of current, system-level progress within the PI. It’s the true measure of ART velocity and progress. Achieving this requires implementing the scalable engineering practices necessary to support Continuous Integration across the ART. By holding regular system demos, the ART can evaluate the quality, functionality, and usability of the solution, as well as identify and resolve any issues, risks, or dependencies. The system demo also provides an opportunity for feedback and learning from the customers, Business Owners, and other stakeholders, which can help the ART to align with the vision and goals, and to adapt to changing needs and expectations.