Pegasystems PEGACPRSA22V1 Certified Pega Robotics System Architect 22 Exam Practice Test

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the Increase Deployment Version property in the project settings is used to automatically update the deployment version number each time the project is deployed.

This ensures version consistency across builds and deployments in environments managed by Pega Robot Manager.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Project Deployment and Version Control”:

“The Increase Deployment Version property, when set to True, automatically increments the project’s deployment version number during the deployment process.

This feature helps maintain proper version tracking and eliminates the need for manual version adjustments before deployment.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Environment Overrides – Used to specify environment-specific configuration overrides, not for version control.

B. Version field – Displays the current version number but does not auto-increment it.

C. Description field – Used for textual descriptions of the project only.

D. Increase Deployment Version – Correct. When set to True, it automatically adjusts the version numbering upon deployment.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

During interrogation of web applications, developers often encounter dynamic or hidden controls — such as drop-down menus or hover-triggered lists — that do not immediately appear on the page.

To successfully interrogate these elements, Pega Robot Studio provides two essential tools:

The Delay option on the Interrogation Form, which allows the developer time to trigger the hidden control before capture.

The Select Element option, which enables precise selection of an element directly from the DOM, even if it is not immediately visible.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Interrogating Dynamic and Hidden Web Controls”:

“When interrogating hidden or dynamically rendered controls:

Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form to give yourself time to hover over or activate a hidden control before Robot Studio attempts to capture it.

Use the Select Element option to manually highlight and select a control from the web application’s DOM, even when it is displayed only after an interaction such as mouse hover.These methods are particularly effective for controls that expand or render asynchronously, such as drop-down menus or tooltip-triggered elements.”

Detailed Step Reasoning:

C. Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form.

Correct.

The Delay setting pauses the interrogation process for a specified number of seconds, allowing you to hover over the hidden element (e.g., AddressType menu) and make it visible before capture.

Once the menu appears, Pega Robot Studio can detect and interrogate it.

D. On the Interrogation Form, select Select Element.

Correct.

The Select Element tool allows manual selection of an element directly from the web page’s HTML DOM structure.

This is especially useful for hidden or dynamically rendered elements like the AddressType dropdown that may not be visible until hovered over.

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. In the Interrogation Form dialog box, select HTML Table Editor.

Incorrect.

The HTML Table Editor is used to inspect and modify HTML table-based controls (grid or table structures), not dynamic menus.

B. On the Web Controls tab, select the page, and then click List Web Controls.

Incorrect.

The List Web Controls option lists already recognized controls in the DOM but cannot reveal or capture hidden dynamic elements.

E. On the Application tab, click the Virtual Controls tab.

Incorrect.

Virtual Controls are used for defining custom controls when the default adapter cannot identify one, not for capturing hidden menu elements.

Final Correct Answer:

C. Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form.

D. On the Interrogation Form, select Select Element.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When building robotic automations intended for integration with Pega Platform (through Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) or Robotic Process Automation (RPA)), Pega Systems outlines a set of best practices to ensure reliable execution, data consistency, and seamless communication between the automation and Pega case workflows.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Developing Robot Activities for Pega Integration”, the following recommendations are provided:

“When developing automations intended for execution by Pega applications, adhere to the following guidelines:

Always return a valid completion status from the automation to indicate success or failure to the calling Pega activity.

Ensure that the data exchanged between Pega Platform and the automation matches in both type and format to prevent runtime errors or data transformation issues.

The activity name in Pega Platform (as specified in the robotic automation name field) must exactly match the name defined in the Robot Activity component in Robot Studio to establish a valid invocation link.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Set valid completion status.

Correct. Each automation that is invoked from Pega must return a valid completion status (e.g., Success, Fail, Completed, Error). This status is sent back through the Robot Activity response data transform.

This ensures that the Pega case or data page correctly interprets the automation’s result and can take subsequent actions (e.g., proceed, retry, or raise an exception).

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application.

Correct. The data types and structure between Pega and the robotic automation must align (for example, string-to-string, integer-to-integer, JSON format consistency).

Mismatched or unstructured data results in serialization errors when passing data through the RDA bridge.

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name.

Correct. The Robotic Automation Name specified in the Pega data page or case configuration (e.g., FETCH_SCORE) must exactly match the ActivityName property defined in the Robot Studio’s Robot Activity component.

This linkage ensures that the correct automation is triggered when the case executes the RDA call.

Incorrect Options:

B. Design an automation to complete multiple tasks.

Not recommended. Pega advises building modular automations, where each automation performs a single defined task to simplify debugging and improve reuse.

C. Use an unlimited number of transferable data items.

Not recommended. The number of data items passed between Pega and Robotics should be limited to those necessary for the task, as excessive data transfers can degrade performance.

F. Run automations synchronously.

Not required. RDA automations typically run asynchronously, returning results through callback mechanisms to avoid blocking the user interface.

Therefore, the three recommended developer considerations are:

A. Set valid completion status

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name

In Pega Robot Studio, when an automation (especially one invoked as a robot activity by Pega Platform) finishes execution, it must return a Completion Status. This status helps the Pega Platform determine the outcome of the automation and decide whether to continue the workflow, retry, or handle an exception.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Robot Activity Completion Status and Workflow Integration”:

“Each robotic activity returns a Completion Status to the Pega Platform after execution.

The completion status communicates the final outcome of the automation’s operation, indicating whether it successfully completed, encountered errors, or produced invalid data.

The most common statuses used are:

Complete: The automation ran successfully, and data passed all validation checks.

DidNotComplete: The automation ran to completion, but business validation failed or data was deemed invalid.

CompletedWithErrors: The automation could not complete execution due to a system or process error.”

Detailed Reasoning:

Complete

Indicates that the robotic automation successfully executed and the resulting data passed all validation checks within Pega.

This allows the Pega case flow to continue normally.

Correct Match: “If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.”

CompletedWithErrors

Used when the automation fails to complete due to a technical issue or system error (for example, an application did not load or a connector failed).

This causes the flow to route as a failure in Pega.

Correct Match: “If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.”

DidNotComplete

Indicates that the automation successfully executed technically but failed business validation, such as incorrect data, missing inputs, or business rule mismatches.

Correct Match: “If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.”

Final Correct Matching Order:

Completion Status

Automation Description

Complete

If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.

CompletedWithErrors

If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.

DidNotComplete

If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When debugging automations in Pega Robot Studio, breakpoints are used to pause execution at specific points in an automation to inspect data and control flow. Before deploying or packaging a robotic solution, it is recommended to remove or clear all breakpoints to ensure that the production build executes uninterrupted.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Debugging Automations and Managing Breakpoints”:

“Breakpoints can be added, enabled, disabled, or deleted directly from the automation design surface or from the Debugging Tools window.

To remove breakpoints, developers can:

Right-click a breakpoint in the automation and select Remove Breakpoint.

Clear all breakpoints globally from the Breakpoints tab within the Debugging Tools window.

Breakpoints are maintained per automation and persist between sessions until manually removed or cleared.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

Correct. This is the global method to remove all existing breakpoints across multiple automations at once.

The Breakpoints tab under Debug → Windows → Breakpoints lists every active breakpoint and includes the Clear All option to delete them.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Correct. This is the direct method for deleting an individual breakpoint from within a specific automation.

C. Use the hot keys to remove each automation link that includes a breakpoint.

Incorrect. There is no hot key dedicated to breakpoint removal in Pega Robot Studio.

D. Right-click an automation on the automation surface, and then select Delete all breakpoints.

Incorrect. There is no such option available at the automation (background surface) level. Breakpoints are only removable individually or through the Breakpoints tab.

E. Click a breakpoint in an automation, and then press the Delete key.

Incorrect. The Delete key removes automation components, not debugging breakpoints.

Final Correct Answers:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

The Label/Jump To functionality in Pega Robot Studio is used to improve automation organization and logical control flow.

Labels act as named anchor points within a single automation, and Jump To links can redirect the execution flow to these labeled points.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Using Labels and Jump To Blocks in Automations”:

“The Label/Jump To functionality enables structured flow management within a single automation.

Labels define points in the automation to which the execution flow can jump.

Jump To blocks redirect execution to a corresponding label, allowing developers to organize complex automations into manageable sections.

This feature is particularly useful for debugging, error handling, and implementing multiple exit paths within a single automation.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. It allows you to pass variables to different parts or workflows of the same automation.

Incorrect. The Label/Jump To mechanism changes the flow of execution; it does not pass or transfer variable data between workflows.

B. It allows you to keep automations organized and aids in debugging.

Correct. Labels and Jump To blocks make complex automations more readable and structured by dividing logic into sections. This improves debugging and maintenance.

C. It allows you to pass variables to different automations of the same project.

Incorrect. Variables between automations are passed using parameters (inputs/outputs), not Label/Jump To blocks.

D. It allows you to have multiple Exit points in an automation.

Correct. By strategically placing labels and jumps, you can create multiple exit conditions or termination points within a single automation, improving control flow.

E. It allows you to connect with other automations in the project.

Incorrect. Connections to other automations are made through automation calls, not Label/Jump To links.

Final Correct Answer: B, D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the StartMethod and Path properties determine how an adapter attaches to or launches a target application. When interrogating applications, these configurations must be correctly defined for Robot Studio to recognize and interact with the application’s user interface elements.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Application Adapter Properties and Interrogation Settings”, it states:

“The StartMethod property defines how Pega Robot Studio connects to or starts an application.

When using the ‘MonitorAll’ method, Robot Studio does not start the application automatically; instead, it waits for an existing instance of the application to be detected at runtime.

If the ‘Path’ property is undefined when using MonitorAll, the adapter has no reference to locate or attach to the running process, preventing interrogation of controls.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The MonitorAll StartMethod is typically used to attach to an already running application rather than launching a new instance.

For this to function correctly, Robot Studio needs to know which process to monitor, and that is determined by the Path property (the executable location of the target application).

If the Path property is missing or left undefined, Robot Studio cannot identify which process to monitor, even though the application may appear to launch.

As a result, the bullseye tool will not function because no valid application handle is established for interrogation.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — StartAndWait requires both the executable and window parameters, but the symptom here points specifically to an undefined Path under MonitorAll.

B. Incorrect — StartOnProject determines whether the app launches with the project, not whether it can be interrogated.

C. Incorrect — Start with undefined TargetPath would prevent the app from launching, but the question states the app does load.

D. Correct — Using MonitorAll without a defined Path prevents Robot Studio from attaching to the process, disabling interrogation.

Therefore, the correct answer is D — the StartMethod on the application is set to MonitorAll, but the Path property is undefined.

(Correct Order):

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

Interrogate the Windows form.

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

Click OK to save the selection

Unlike web or text-based controls, Windows application menus (such as File, Edit, or Help) are often rendered as non-standard Windows controls that cannot be directly interrogated using the bullseye tool.

Instead, Pega Robot Studio provides a specific method to add menu items through the interrogation hierarchy.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Interrogating Menu Items in Windows Applications”:

“Menu items in Windows applications are not directly interrogated through visual selection.

Instead, the process involves interrogating the parent form, identifying the menu control in the hierarchy, and then using the ‘Add Menu Items’ option to expose individual menu commands as controls.

Steps:

Start interrogation for the Windows adapter.

Interrogate the main form that contains the menu bar.

Navigate to the window containing the menu to ensure visibility.

In the control hierarchy, select the menu bar control.

From the More menu, choose Add menu items.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items to expose as interrogated controls.

Click OK to confirm and save your selections.”

Detailed Step Reasoning:

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

Launches the adapter and begins the interrogation session.

Interrogate the Windows form.

Interrogates the main form containing the menu bar control (the top-level parent for menus).

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

Ensures the correct active window is in focus for interrogation.

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

Identifies the menu bar or parent control within the form’s hierarchy.

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

Opens the configuration dialog for menu interrogation.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

Displays a list of all available menu items to expose as automatable elements.

Click OK to save the selection.

Finalizes interrogation and creates the selected menu items as controls in the project hierarchy.

Final Ordered Steps:

Order

Interrogation Step

1

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

2

Interrogate the Windows form.

3

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

4

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

5

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

6

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

7

Click OK to save the selection.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

Application Discovery is the initial phase in Pega Robotics project development where developers analyze target applications before interrogation. The goal is to understand how each application behaves, what technology it uses, and how it interacts with other systems.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Application Discovery and Analysis Before Interrogation”:

“Before interrogating applications, conduct application discovery to ensure that automations can be designed effectively.

During discovery, developers should:

Determine the type and technology of each application (web, Windows, Java, or text-based).

Verify how each application is launched and operates outside Robot Studio to ensure accessibility.

Identify how many instances of each application the user accesses concurrently.

Observe dependencies or interactions between applications for orchestration planning.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Verify the number of application instances accessed by the user simultaneously.

Correct. This ensures that the automation can handle multiple instances (e.g., several browser windows or desktop clients).

C. Verify how the application opens outside of Pega Robot Studio.

Correct. Understanding launch methods (desktop shortcuts, URLs, credentials) helps configure adapters correctly.

E. Identify the technology on which the application is built (web, Windows, text).

Correct. This determines which adapter type (Web, Windows, or Text adapter) to configure in the project.

Incorrect Options:

B. Verify that the automation works as intended.

Incorrect. This happens after interrogation during testing, not during discovery.

D. Verify the interactions between all applications in the project.

Partially correct but not part of the discovery phase—it’s addressed in the design phase.

F. Verify the match rules on all interrogated controls.

Incorrect. This is performed after interrogation, not during discovery.

Final Correct Answer: A, C, E

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, when interrogating Java applications, sometimes a child process is created separately from the main application process. In such cases, controls in the child process cannot be detected unless the adapter is configured to attach to child processes as well.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Java Application Integration and Child Processes”:

“For Java applications that spawn additional processes, set the HookChildProcesses property of the adapter to True.

This enables the adapter to attach to both the main process and any child processes created by the parent application, allowing interrogation and automation of controls within those secondary windows.”

Detailed Reasoning:

HookChildProcesses ensures that when a Java application spawns a new process (such as a popup or a grid), Pega Robotics attaches to and monitors that process.

Without enabling this property, the adapter would only recognize the primary Java process, leaving controls in secondary processes unrecognized.

Option Analysis:

A. HookChildProcesses: Correct. Allows interrogation of child processes.

B. EnableMatchInProcess: Incorrect. Used for controlling object matching within the same process context.

C. TargetPath: Incorrect. Defines executable location for adapters.

D. IgnoreMainBrowser: Incorrect. Related to web adapters, not Java applications.

Pega Robotics Studio – Automation Design Concepts (Entry/Exit Points & Parameters)

“An automation can expose multiple exit points (for example, Success and Failure) and can define output parameters that return values to the caller. When the automation completes, the appropriate exit point is raised and the output parameters are made available to the caller.”

Pega Robotics Studio – Calling Automations (Run and Parameter Mapping)

“When one automation calls another, the called automation appears as a component with input parameters, output parameters, and exit points. The caller wires the Success/Failure exits to the next steps and maps output parameters (for example, result, errCode) to downstream logic.”

Why Option C is correct:

The UpdateCustomerDetails block in Option C clearly shows two exit points — Success and Failure — and two output parameters — result and errCode — on the subautomation.

The wiring demonstrates a typical pattern:

On Success, the flow proceeds to a success path with result available.

On Failure, the flow proceeds to a failure path with errCode available (the extra, unused result pin on the failure jump is permissible but not required).

This matches the specification precisely: two exits (Success/Failure) and two outputs (result, errCode).

Why the other options are not correct:

Option A: Shows errCode but does not expose result clearly as an output to the success path.

Option B: The component does not display errCode as an output parameter of the subautomation.

Option D: Emphasizes an additional boolean/conditional output and maps result on the failure path, which does not reflect the stated definition of the subautomation outputs.

Document Sources (Exact Extracts Reference):

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide — Automation Design Concepts: Entry/Exit Points and Parameters.

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide — Calling Automations and Mapping Inputs/Outputs.

Pega Robotics System Certification Study Material — Subautomation design patterns (Success/Failure with output parameters).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

An application project item in Pega Robot Studio represents an integration layer between the automation project and an external application (Windows, Web, or Text). Each project item defines how to launch, attach, and control the target application.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Application Project Items Overview”, it states:

“An application project item defines the interaction between a robotic solution and an external application.

It provides properties, methods, and events that allow the automation to start, monitor, and control the target application.

Pega Robot Studio supports application project items for Windows, Web, and Text adapters, enabling integration with all major enterprise application types.”

Detailed Reasoning:

Option A is correct because application project items are the mechanism by which Pega Robotics integrates with Windows, Web, and Text applications on the client machine.

Option E is correct because each application project item exposes properties, methods, and events that control application behavior (for example, launch, close, monitor, or read UI data).

Option B is incorrect — Pega Platform integration is handled through Robot Manager or Runtime API, not through application project items.

Option C is incorrect — Application items do not use REST or JavaScript; these are specific to web connectors.

Option D is incorrect — Deployment orchestration and robot monitoring are performed by Robot Manager, not by an application project item.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

The Excel Connector in Pega Robot Studio is a lightweight component that provides direct interaction with Excel files without relying on the Microsoft Excel application. It is ideal for background processing, where users are not required to interact with Excel directly.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Excel Integration and Connectors section):

“The Excel Connector allows automations to open, read, and modify Excel workbooks without requiring Microsoft Excel to be installed.

It operates directly on the file system level, supporting operations such as reading or writing to specific cells, entire worksheets, or data ranges.

The connector does not use Excel Interop; therefore, no interrogation or Excel application process is necessary.”

Explanation of Options:

A. Correct — The Excel Connector supports data range operations such as defining, reading, or writing to specific sets of cells within a worksheet.

B. Incorrect — The connector does not depend on any installed version of Microsoft Office; it functions independently.

C. Incorrect — Interrogation applies to UI applications, not file-based connectors like Excel Connector.

D. Correct — The connector works without Excel being installed; it manipulates workbook data directly through file handling APIs.

E. Incorrect — When user interaction with Excel is required, Excel Interop (Excel Application Connector) should be used instead of the file-based Excel Connector.

Therefore, the correct statements are A and D.

In Pega Platform, data objects used for integration with robot activities (whether attended or unattended) must be scalar properties — that is, single-value fields such as Text, Decimal, Date, Boolean, etc. Scalar properties represent discrete, individual data elements that can be directly serialized and passed between Pega Platform and Pega Robot Studio automations.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Data Mapping Between Robot Activities and Pega Case Data”:

“Robot activities can import and export data values only for scalar properties.

Scalar properties represent single data items, while complex or list structures (such as Page Lists or Page Groups) cannot be directly transferred.

Complex data types must be iterated or flattened before being used in a robot activity.”

In the image provided, the data model includes several scalar properties (e.g., AmountOfTransactionToDispute, pyID, TransactionAmount) and one list-type property — Transactions, defined as a List of records.

Detailed Reasoning:

A. AmountOfTransactionToDispute — Scalar property of type Decimal. Can be imported/exported by robot activities.

B. pyID — Scalar property of type Text (single line). Can be used in robot activity data mapping.

C. Transactions — Non-scalar property defined as a List of records.

This represents a collection (a Page List) rather than a single field.

Robot activities cannot directly import or export this type; it must be handled via iteration or transformation before use.

D. TransactionAmount — Scalar property of type Decimal. Can be imported/exported normally.

Therefore, Transactions is the only non-scalar property in the model and cannot be directly imported or exported to or from a robot activity.

Final Correct Answer: C. Transactions