PRINCE2 PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation PRINCE2 Agile Foundation (Version 2) Exam Exam Practice Test

The Release Planning Workshop is the forum where planning for the next stage occurs in PRINCE2 Agile. This workshop brings together the project management team and delivery teams to plan the scope, schedule, and resources for the upcoming release or stage. It helps align business priorities with delivery capacity and supports incremental and iterative delivery approaches.

The Team Planning Workshop focuses on more detailed planning at the team level within the release, the Team Retrospective Workshop is dedicated to reflecting on performance and improving processes, and the Progress Review Workshop is for reviewing progress against the plan rather than planning future work.

Kanban uses a flow-based approach to visualize and control work in progress (WIP). It emphasizes limiting WIP to improve flow and reduce bottlenecks, with continuous monitoring via Kanban boards. This approach supports flexibility, transparency, and efficiency in managing tasks.

The Agilometer (A) measures agility, Lean (B) is a broad philosophy focusing on waste reduction, and Scrum (D) is an iterative framework but uses time-boxed sprints rather than flow-based control.

Agile workshops are collaborative sessions used throughout the project to address various aspects such as problem-solving, release planning, team alignment, and continuous improvement. Workshops encourage open communication, collective decision-making, and foster a shared understanding of goals and challenges.

Unlike a delegation matrix, which defines roles and authorities, or the project log, which records issues and risks, workshops are interactive events that enable timely resolution of challenges. The Agilometer is a diagnostic tool assessing agility maturity but not a problem-solving forum.

Agile workshops embody the agile principle of collaboration and adaptability, enabling teams to respond quickly to issues and refine plans collectively.

The assess step involves evaluating the probability and impact of identified risks to determine their severity and prioritize them for management. This step is crucial for effective risk control and helps allocate resources appropriately.

Planning relates to defining how to manage risks, identification involves discovering risks, and implementation concerns applying risk responses.

Trading/swapping is a technique used within the issues practice to manage and resolve conflicts or competing priorities by negotiating trade-offs. For example, scope items, resources, or deadlines may be traded or swapped between stakeholders to reach agreements that keep the project on track.

This collaborative negotiation supports flexible, pragmatic issue resolution, aligning with agile values of collaboration and customer focus. It enables project teams to balance competing demands while maintaining progress and business justification.

Objectives and key results (B) are goal-setting tools, refactoring (C) is a technical practice for code improvement, and delegation poker (D) is about decision-making authority — none specifically target issue resolution.

Trading/swapping aligns with PRINCE2’s controlled management of issues and agile’s collaborative problem-solving approach.

In PRINCE2 Agile, a Backlog is the prioritized list of requirements, features, or user stories that define what needs to be delivered for a product. It is a dynamic and evolving list that is continually refined and re-prioritized to ensure the most valuable work is done first. The backlog acts as a single source of truth for what the team needs to deliver and provides transparency to stakeholders regarding progress and priorities. It aligns with agile principles and practices such as Scrum, where the Product Backlog contains all desired work for the product.

The Project Canvas is a high-level tool used for defining project scope and objectives, the Release Map plans releases and iterations, and the Project Log tracks issues, risks, and actions but does not list prioritized requirements.

The Team Retrospective Workshop is explicitly designed to facilitate team growth and continuous improvement in working practices. It is a fundamental agile practice where the team reflects on the recently completed work or sprint to identify what went well, what didn’t, and what could be improved. The goal is to foster an environment of trust and openness, enabling teams to discuss challenges and successes honestly.

Retrospectives promote inspect and adapt principles by encouraging teams to continuously evaluate their processes, collaboration, and tools. They help uncover systemic issues, process bottlenecks, or interpersonal challenges that may be impeding productivity or quality. Teams use this feedback to implement actionable improvements, which can range from adjusting communication methods to refining definitions of done or ready.

This workshop supports a key agile mindset—continuous learning and improvement—which directly contributes to team maturity, performance, and morale. Importantly, retrospectives are not about assigning blame but rather about fostering a growth mindset that accepts change as an opportunity to evolve.

While Project Kickoff Workshops (A) initiate project alignment and Progress Review Workshops (C) monitor project status, they do not primarily focus on team process improvements. The Team Planning Workshop (D) is concerned with planning upcoming work, not retrospection.

In PRINCE2 Agile, retrospectives are a critical tool to blend traditional project management with agile principles by promoting regular reflection and incremental enhancements.

Reference https://publications.axelos.com/prince2agile2016/content.aspx?page=pra_126 &showNav=true&expandNav=true

When transitioning from project delivery into business as usual (BAU), establishing regular feedback loops is crucial to ensure continual improvement. Feedback loops enable ongoing monitoring, learning, and adaptation of both products and processes post-transition. They provide mechanisms for capturing user experiences, operational issues, and evolving requirements that inform future iterations and enhancements.

Feedback loops can take many forms, such as user surveys, retrospectives, operational reviews, or service desk reports. Their regularity and structure ensure that BAU teams remain aligned with customer needs and organizational goals while adapting to changes effectively. This approach fosters a culture of continuous learning and agility even after the formal project has closed.

Providing access to Kanban or team boards (A) supports transparency and workflow management but is more tactical and internal to teams rather than a strategic approach to continuous improvement across BAU. Agreeing on SLAs (C) and KPIs (D) define performance and service targets but do not inherently drive feedback or improvement cycles without mechanisms for learning and response.

PRINCE2 Agile highlights the importance of feedback loops as part of the ‘progress’ and ‘quality’ practices extended into BAU to sustain value delivery.

The Progress Review Workshop is the key forum to assess the current status of the project and address challenges or issues affecting progress. It typically involves reviewing the current stage or release against plan, assessing risks, issues, and dependencies, and agreeing on corrective actions or decisions to keep the project on track.

While retrospectives (B and C) focus on reflecting and improving team practices, and team planning (A) looks ahead to upcoming work, progress reviews are focused on monitoring, control, and decision-making at the project or stage level.

This workshop aligns with PRINCE2’s principle of manage by exception, enabling timely interventions without unnecessary escalation.

The product owner is responsible for preparing and maintaining the product backlog, ensuring it accurately reflects user requirements, priorities, and acceptance criteria. This role acts as the voice of the customer, maximizing product value by managing backlog items, ordering them to reflect business priorities, and clarifying requirements for development teams.

Monitoring stage progress (A) and managing project-level risks (B) are typically roles of the project manager or risk owner within PRINCE2 governance. The project backlog (C) contains higher-level requirements for the entire project and is not the product owner's direct responsibility.

The product owner bridges business and delivery, ensuring the team works on the most valuable features while maintaining clarity and quality of backlog items.

Personas in PRINCE2 Agile serve as fictional, archetypal users representing the needs, behaviors, and goals of real users. In the business case practice, personas are used to identify and articulate specific user benefits. This ensures the project focuses on delivering value that meets the actual needs of different user groups.

By understanding personas, teams can tailor product features and prioritize requirements that provide meaningful benefits, thereby strengthening the business case and increasing stakeholder buy-in. Personas help clarify who will use the product, what problems they face, and how the solution delivers value.

Personas go beyond demographic grouping (A); they are detailed profiles including motivations and pain points. They do not relate directly to timelines (B) or product version differentiation (D).

Using personas aligns with agile principles of customer focus and continuous stakeholder engagement embedded in PRINCE2 Agile.

Culture refers to the collective attitudes, values, beliefs, and goals shared by a group or organization. It shapes how people behave, make decisions, and interact. In PRINCE2 Agile, understanding and adapting organizational culture is critical for successful agile adoption and delivery.

Leadership (B) influences culture but is distinct, co-creation (C) is a collaborative approach, and management (D) relates to planning and control activities.

A positive, agile-friendly culture fosters openness, trust, and continuous improvement.

A key criterion for the Definition of Ready is that acceptance criteria are measurable. This ensures that work items are clearly understood, well-defined, and have objective criteria to confirm when they are complete. Measurable acceptance criteria reduce ambiguity and support efficient development and quality assurance.

Other options describe completion or handover stages, which are more relevant to the Definition of Done, not Ready.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in PRINCE2 Agile is recognized as a tool that can assist in reducing uncertainty and ambiguity by providing data-driven insights, predictive analytics, and automation of routine tasks. This support helps teams better understand changing environments and respond faster, thereby addressing complexity associated with change initiatives.

While AI can add complexity if misused, PRINCE2 Agile focuses on its beneficial role in supporting decision-making and reducing unknowns rather than complicating governance or communication.