ITIL ITIL-4-Transition ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Exam Exam Practice Test

Results-based measurement and reporting is a method of measuring and reporting the outcomes and value delivered by products and services, rather than the activities and outputs involved in their creation and delivery12. Results-based measurement and reporting focuses on the achievement of objectives and the satisfaction of stakeholders, rather than the consumption of resources and the completion of tasks12.

An example of results-based measurement and reporting is measuring and reporting the customer satisfaction with closed incidents. This is because customer satisfaction is an indicator of the value and quality of the incident management practice and the service provided to the customers. Customer satisfaction reflects the extent to which the customers’ expectations and needs have been met by the resolution of the incidents. Customer satisfaction can also influence the customer loyalty, retention, and advocacy for the service provider34.

The other options are not examples of results-based measurement and reporting, because they measure and report the inputs and outputs of the service delivery, rather than the outcomes and value. Measuring and reporting the number of hours worked by service desk employees, the number of supplier-related interruptions to a service, and the cost of providing a service to customers and users are all examples of activity-based or output-based measurement and reporting. These metrics do not indicate the effectiveness or efficiency of the service delivery, nor the satisfaction or value perceived by the customers and users12.

Comprehensive Explanation:

A known error is defined as:

A problem that has been analyzed, has a known root cause, and may or may not have a workaround.

It may still be unresolved.

Therefore, Option C is correct.

 The best approach for validating service value in a partnership relationship with a service consumer is to work together to identify methods of checking service value and check that value propositions are still valid. This is because this approach aligns with the ITIL 4 guiding principles of focus on value, collaborate and promote visibility, and progress iteratively with feedback1.

By working together, the service provider and the service consumer can co-create value and ensure that the services delivered meet the needs and expectations of the service consumer and other stakeholders. They can also share information and feedback, and adjust the services accordingly to respond to changing requirements and opportunities. Moreover, they can jointly define the criteria and indicators for measuring and validating the value of the services, such as the outcomes, costs, risks, and benefits23.

The value propositions of the services are the statements that describe the benefits and value that the services offer to the service consumer and other stakeholders. They are based on the understanding of the service consumer’s needs, preferences, and goals. The value propositions should be regularly reviewed and validated to ensure that they are still relevant and accurate, and that they reflect the current and future value of the services45.

The other options are not the best approach for validating service value, because they are either too narrow, too passive, or too reactive. They do not involve the active collaboration and co-creation of value between the service provider and the service consumer, nor do they account for the complexity and agility of the services provided.

A transformation to high velocity IT is a change that involves adopting digital operating models and practices that enable organizations to deliver products and services faster, better, and cheaper. High velocity IT is not suitable for all organizations or all parts of an organization, as it depends on the context, culture, and objectives of each situation. Therefore, statements A and C are incorrect. High velocity IT is especially relevant for customer-facing systems, as they need to meet the changing needs and expectations of customers in a competitive and dynamic environment. Therefore, statement D is also incorrect. High performance is usually part of the change, as high velocity IT aims to improve the quality, value, and outcomes of the products and services delivered, as well as the efficiency, effectiveness, and agility of the processes and practices involved. Therefore, statement B is correct. References:

ITIL 4 Specialist: High-velocity IT | Axelos

ITIL 4 High-velocity IT: the digital enterprise | Axelos

ITIL 4 High Velocity IT (HVIT) Book - EVERYONE - Skillsoft

ITIL® 4 Specialist: High Velocity IT - Good e-Learning

Comprehensive Explanation:

The practices have different purposes:

Incident Management:

Focuses on restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible after interruptions.

Service Desk:

Acts as the single point of contact for users, ensuring communication, updates, and support.

Option A correctly captures these distinct roles:

Incident management = restoration

Service desk = communication interface

Comprehensive Explanation:

Service level management is responsible for:

Ensuring services meet agreed service levels

Conducting service reviews with customers

Verifying that services continue to meet customer needs

Therefore, Option B is correct.

 Value stream mapping is a technique that helps to understand the end-to-end flow of user support, from the demand to the value delivery. It is a tool that features in ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support. Value stream mapping can help to identify the steps, activities, roles, responsibilities, tools, and outcomes involved in the user support process. It can also help to identify the value, waste, and opportunities for improvement in each step. Value stream mapping can help the organization to optimize the user support process and enhance the customer experience. Therefore, using value stream mapping is the first step the organization should take to start to improve the situation. The other options are not the first steps, but they could be considered after the value stream mapping is done. Reviewing skills and competencies of user support staff, improving the integration of tools, and encouraging teams to collaborate are all possible actions that could result from the value stream mapping analysis, but they are not the first step to understand the problem and the current state of the user support process. References:

ITIL 4 & swarming – finding the right people & process | Axelos1

Swarming vs Tiered Support Models Explained - BMC Software1

What ITSM Practitioners Need to Know About Value Stream Mapping2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition:

ITIL 4 defines service relationship management as:

“Joint activities performed by a service provider and a service consumer to ensure continual value co-creation.”

It includes all interactions between provider and consumer, such as:

Service provisioning

Service consumption

Relationship-building activities

Thus, Option D is the exact ITIL 4 answer.

Comprehensive Explanation:

ITIL defines Monitoring and Event Management as:

The practice that systematically observes services and components, identifies changes of state, and records/reports them as events.

This description matches Option C exactly.

According to ITIL 4, one of the guiding principles is to progress iteratively with feedback. This means that IT service providers should break down complex tasks or changes into manageable chunks, seek feedback after each iteration, and use the feedback to improve and adapt their actions. Feedback is essential for co-creating value with customers and stakeholders, as well as for learning and improving the quality of IT services. Therefore, IT managers should establish effective feedback channels that enable two-way communication with staff and other parties involved in the IT service delivery. The best approach for establishing effective feedback channels is to research how individual teams communicate internally and use the most popular collaboration tools to collect feedback. This way, IT managers can leverage the existing communication preferences and habits of the staff, and avoid imposing a new tool or method that may not be suitable or convenient for them. By using the most popular collaboration tools, IT managers can also ensure that the feedback is timely, relevant, and accessible for all parties. This approach aligns with the ITIL 4 principle of collaborating and promoting visibility, which encourages IT service providers to work together across boundaries, share information, and make use of diverse perspectives and feedback. Therefore, the answer is A. Research how individual teams communicate internally and use the most popular collaboration tools to collect feedback. The other options are not the best approach for establishing effective feedback channels, because they either do not facilitate two-way communication, or do not consider the needs and preferences of the staff. For example, option B. Establish office hours where staff are encouraged to drop by without appointments and discuss any concerns they have, may not be convenient or practical for staff who work remotely or have different schedules. Option C. Initiate a project to select and implement a collaboration tool to facilitate two-way communication with staff, may take too long and may not match the expectations or requirements of the staff. Option D. Publish a printed weekly newsletter that clearly and consistently communicates change, may not be effective or efficient for collecting feedback, as it is a one-way communication channel that does not allow for immediate or interactive responses. References:

The 7 Guiding Principles of ITIL 4: Progress iteratively with feedback1

Guiding Principles of ITIL 4: Progress Iteratively with Feedback2

The customer journey and ITIL 43

The correct answer is D. Identifying and making request for outstanding payments for the service. This is because the service provider should ensure that the financial obligations of the customer are fulfilled before the service is terminated. The service provider should also update the billing and accounting records, and close any open invoices or disputes related to the service12.

A. Ensuring that user access rights are revoked for all services is not the correct answer, because the service provider should only revoke the user access rights for the service that is being retired, not for all services. The service provider should also ensure that the customer data and assets related to the service are securely deleted or transferred, and that the service provider staff are reassigned or released12.

B. Providing information to users about how to contact the service desk is not the correct answer, because the service desk is not relevant for the service that is being retired. The service provider should provide information to users about how to access alternative or replacement services, if any, and how to provide feedback or complaints about the service retirement process12.

C. Creating training schedules for users on how to use the service is not the correct answer, because the service is being retired, not introduced. The service provider should not invest any resources or efforts in training users on how to use a service that will no longer be available. The service provider should instead focus on communicating the service retirement plan and timeline, and managing the expectations and emotions of the users12. References:

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper - English, page 10, question 3, answer D

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Candidate Syllabus - English, page 11, learning outcome 1.5

The organization should follow the approach of creating one value stream for the entire project, to enable an end-to-end, holistic vision of the service. A value stream is a series of steps that an organization undertakes to create and deliver products and services to consumers. A value stream should cover the whole service value chain, from the demand to the value delivery. Creating one value stream for the entire project helps to ensure that the service is aligned with the customer needs, expectations, and outcomes, and that the value is co-created by the provider and the consumer. Creating one value stream also helps to identify the value, waste, and opportunities for improvement in each step, and to optimize the service delivery process. The other options are not correct, as they would result in fragmented, incomplete, or inconsistent value streams. Creating separate value streams for practices, people, tools and suppliers would not consider the ‘four dimensions’ equally, but rather isolate them from each other. Creating separate value streams for every project phase would not ensure that each milestone is achieved in an Agile manner, but rather create gaps and delays between the phases. Creating one value stream for each team would not allow the teams to focus on their different objectives, but rather create silos and conflicts among the teams. References:

ITIL 4 & swarming – finding the right people & process | Axelos1

Swarming vs Tiered Support Models Explained - BMC Software2

What ITSM Practitioners Need to Know About Value Stream Mapping3

ITIL 4 Value Streams: do the right things for customer | Axelos4

Safety culture is a concept that refers to the shared beliefs, perceptions, and values in relation to risks within an organization. A safety culture encourages people to be open and honest about their mistakes, learn from them, and improve their performance. A safety culture also fosters trust, collaboration, and visibility among IT staff, which can help to obtain the information needed to resolve problems. According to ITIL 4, safety culture aligns with the guiding principle of “collaborate and promote visibility”, which states that “working together across boundaries produces results that have greater buy-in, more relevance to objectives, and increased likelihood of long-term success” 1. Safety culture is also one of the key elements of the high-velocity IT approach, which aims to enable organizations to thrive in the digital era 23. References:

ITIL 4 Information security and risk management practices: embedding safety culture and behaviour

Safety cultures and happy employees

The importance of Safety Culture in the success of IT

The correct answer is C because failing to explain service provider actions that impact the customer can erode the trust and transparency that are essential for maintaining a long-term relationship. If the service provider does not communicate the reasons and consequences of their actions, the customer may feel ignored, misled, or dissatisfied. This can lead to conflicts, complaints, or even termination of the contract.

The other options are not as likely to be a threat to the relationship as option C. Scheduling interactions between customer and service provider (option A) can help to ensure regular communication and feedback, which can enhance the relationship. Changes in service provider and customer staff (option B) can be managed by ensuring a smooth handover and orientation process, which can also provide opportunities for building rapport and understanding. Failing to deal with communication in a timely fashion (option D) can cause delays and frustration, but it can be resolved by improving the communication channels and protocols, and by apologizing and explaining the reasons for the delay.

 Design thinking and service-dominant logic have in common that both involve collaborating with customers to ensure their needs are met. Design thinking is a human-centered approach to problem solving that emphasizes empathy, creativity, and experimentation. Service-dominant logic is a framework for understanding value creation, which focuses on the exchange of services between two or more entities. Both concepts share the following principles:

Value is co-created by the provider and the customer in the context of use. The provider does not deliver value, but rather offers value propositions that the customer can accept or reject. The customer is an active participant in the value creation process, not a passive recipient of goods or services.

The customer is the ultimate judge of value. The provider cannot determine the value of the offering in advance, but rather has to understand the customer’s needs, preferences, and expectations. The provider has to engage with the customer in an ongoing dialogue and feedback loop to ensure that the offering meets or exceeds the customer’s expectations.

The offering is a holistic solution that integrates goods, services, and experiences. The provider does not differentiate between tangible and intangible products, but rather offers a complete solution that addresses the customer’s problem or opportunity. The provider has to design the offering in a way that delivers a positive customer experience and enhances the customer’s well-being. References:

Exploring Overlaps and Differences in Service Dominant Logic and Design Thinking

Service-Dominant Logic: Key Principles and History

Service-Dominant Logic and How It Reframes Our Business Operations

The New Paradigm: H2H Marketing

Comprehensive Explanation:

Major incidents typically require:

Urgent coordinated effort

Involvement of multiple teams or specialists

Focused collaboration

Rapid restoration of service

ITIL describes forming a temporary major incident team as the standard response.

Options A and B are too simple; option D is procedural but not sufficient for major incidents.

According to ITIL 4, change enablement is the practice of ensuring that risks are properly assessed, authorizing changes to proceed, and managing a change schedule in order to maximize the number of successful IT changes. ITIL 4 recognizes that changes can vary in size, complexity, and risk, and therefore proposes different types of changes that require different levels of authorization and control. One of these types is standard change, which is a low-risk, pre-authorized change that is well understood and follows an agreed procedure. Standard changes are typically delegated to the service provider or the service consumer, depending on the nature of the change. For example, a software development team that makes many hundreds of small changes every week can be authorized to approve and implement these changes themselves, as long as they follow the agreed change model and comply with the relevant policies and standards. This way, the software development team can benefit from faster and more efficient change delivery, while minimizing the overhead and bureaucracy of the change enablement process. Therefore, the best answer is D. The other members of the software development team, as they can act as the change authority for standard changes within their scope of work. References:

ITIL 4 Change Management Process | Blog | Digital.ai1

ITIL 4’s Move from Change Management to Change Enablement2

This is the best approach because it ensures that the policy is aligned with the needs and expectations of all the parties involved in incident management. It also fosters a culture of collaboration and trust among the teams, which can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of incident resolution. By involving all the teams in the policy development, the organization can also leverage the experience and knowledge of the staff, and identify any potential gaps or issues that may arise in the incident management process. This approach is consistent with the ITIL 4 guiding principles of collaborate and promote visibility, focus on value, and keep it simple and practical12. References:

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper - English3, page 7, question 2, answer B

ITIL 4 Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition4, page 20, section 2.3, paragraph 2

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Create, Deliver and Support5, page 10, section 1.1, paragraph 4

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Direct, Plan and Improve, page 12, section 1.1, paragraph 3

Comprehensive Explanation:

ITIL defines Change as:

“The addition, modification, or removal of anything that could have a direct or indirect effect on services.”

Therefore, removing something that affects a service is classified as a change.

Thus, Option C is correct.

Comprehensive Explanation:

A Service Level Agreement (SLA) is specifically designed to:

Define expected levels of service

Set targets for performance

Provide a basis for measuring actual service performance

Thus, the SLA functions as the primary tool for defining and measuring service performance in ITIL 4.

Therefore, Option A is correct.

This working practice is not focused on creating value because it does not involve the customers or users in defining the requirements and expectations of the service. It also assumes that the developers’ previous experience is relevant and sufficient for the current situation, which may not be the case. This practice may lead to delivering a service that does not meet the needs and preferences of the customers or users, or that is not aligned with the organization’s strategy and objectives. References:

ITIL 4 Managing Professional Transition Module Sample Paper - English1, page 6, question 1, answer A

ITIL 4 Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition2, page 67, section 4.1.1, paragraph 2

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Create, Deliver and Support3, page 9, section 1.1, paragraph 3

ITIL 4 Managing Professional: Direct, Plan and Improve4, page 11, section 1.1, paragraph 2

Identifying consumer roles in service relationships is a benefit because it helps the service provider to understand the needs, expectations, and responsibilities of each type of consumer. This enables effective stakeholder management, which is the process of identifying, analyzing, planning, and communicating with the people or groups involved in or affected by a service. By knowing the consumer roles, the service provider can tailor the service offerings, agreements, and interactions to suit each role and create value for them. For example, the service provider can communicate with the customer (the person who defines the requirements and pays for the service) about the service strategy and value proposition, while communicating with the user (the person who uses the service) about the service features and feedback. The sponsor (the person who authorizes the budget and supports the service) can also be involved in the decision-making and governance of the service. By identifying and managing the consumer roles, the service provider can build trust, collaboration, and alignment with the consumers and deliver better service outcomes. References: 1, 2, 3

Comprehensive Explanation:

Start where you are emphasizes:

Do not discard what you have until you understand it.

Assess the current state based on evidence, not assumptions.

Use source data and accurate observation.

Option D violates the principle because it suggests removing existing processes before evaluation, which ITIL specifically warns against.

Comprehensive Explanation:

The Continual Improvement practice explicitly requires:

A culture of improvement

Participation from everyone in the organization

Ongoing identification of opportunities

Organizational mindset aligned with continuous enhancement

ITIL 4 emphasizes that continual improvement is not limited to a single team—it must become an organizational culture.

Thus, Option C is correct.

The service value system is a model that describes how all the components and activities of an organization work together as a system to enable value creation. The service value system consists of five elements: governance, service value chain, practices, guiding principles, and continual improvement. Governance is the means by which an organization is directed and controlled. It ensures that the organization’s strategy, policies, and objectives are aligned with the value proposition and the stakeholder needs. Service value chain is a set of interconnected activities that an organization performs to deliver a valuable product or service to its consumers and to facilitate value realization. Practices are sets of organizational resources designed for performing work or accomplishing an objective. Practices include processes, roles, tools, techniques, and methods that enable the organization to carry out its work effectively and efficiently. The other two elements of the service value system are guiding principles and continual improvement, which are not part of the answer options. References:

The ITIL 4 Service Value System Explained - ITSM.tools

Service Value System in ITIL 4 Explained | Sprintzeal

The best way for the organization to collect the information needed to address the complaints is to collect customer experience and service level metrics. Customer experience metrics are measures of how customers perceive the quality and value of the service and the interactions they have with the service provider. Service level metrics are measures of how well the service meets the agreed requirements and expectations of the customers and users. By collecting both types of metrics, the organization can identify the gaps and issues in the service delivery and the customer journey, and take actions to improve them. Some examples of customer experience metrics are customer satisfaction, net promoter score, customer effort score, and customer loyalty. Some examples of service level metrics are availability, reliability, performance, and incident resolution time. References: https://www.axelos.com/resource-hub/blog/itil-4-leads-to-value

https://www.genroe.com/blog/what-is-the-role-of-customer-feedback-in-the-itil-framework/861

Comprehensive Explanation:

Complex incidents typically require:

High-level diagnostic skills

Deep technical or service knowledge

Experience with similar issues

Knowledgeable support staff are the primary resource capable of analyzing and resolving complex incidents.

Self-help is for simple issues; procedures are useful but not sufficient for complex diagnosis; disaster recovery plans are for major disasters, not normal incident handling.

Thus, Option B is correct.