IICRC WRT Water Damage Restoration Technician (WRT) Exam Practice Test

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesdehumidificationas the process of removing water vapor from the air. This process is fundamental to restorative drying because evaporation alone does not remove moisture from a structure; it only changes liquid water into vapor. Without dehumidification (or ventilation), evaporated moisture would remain in the air and eventually re-condense on cooler surfaces.

The WRT curriculum explains that dehumidification works by reducing thehumidity ratio and vapor pressureof the air, thereby maintaining a vapor pressure differential that allows moisture to continue moving from wet materials into the surrounding environment. Refrigerant dehumidifiers accomplish this through condensation, while desiccant dehumidifiers remove moisture through adsorption.

Dehumidification must be properly balanced with airflow and temperature control. The WRT manual emphasizes that excessive evaporation without adequate dehumidification can increase ambient humidity, slow drying, and raise the risk of secondary damage. Conversely, effective dehumidification lowers relative humidity, reduces dew point, and supports sustained evaporation from wet materials.

Humidification is the opposite process, diffusion is passive vapor movement, and evaporation is only one step in the drying cycle. Only dehumidification actively removes water vapor from the air mass, making it the correct definition under WRT standards.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge provides guidance for initial LGR dehumidification capacity based on cubic footage and class of water. For Class 3 intrusions, which involve the greatest amount of moisture absorption and evaporation (excluding Class 4), a higher dehumidification capacity is required.

A commonly taught WRT guideline is approximately one LGR dehumidifier (≈150 PPD) per 3,000 cubic feet for Class 3 conditions. Applying this to a 9,000 cubic foot drying chamber results in a total recommended capacity of approximately 450 PPD.

This capacity ensures that evaporated moisture is removed efficiently, preventing elevated humidity and secondary damage. The WRT curriculum emphasizes that insufficient dehumidification in Class 3 losses can stall drying and increase microbial risk.

As with all equipment recommendations, this is an initial placement subject to adjustment based on monitoring data, but 450 PPD represents the correct starting capacity under WRT guidance.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesClass 2 water intrusionas a condition where asignificant portion of a room (approximately 5% to 40% of combined surface area)is affected, and where moisture has wicked into structural materials such as carpet, cushion, and drywall, but absorption remains relatively shallow.

Class 2 losses typically involve wet carpet and cushion with minimal wall saturation. Evaporation rates are higher than Class 1 but do not reach the extensive saturation levels of Class 3. Low-evaporation materials may be affected, but moisture penetration remains limited.

The WRT manual uses this classification to guide equipment selection, drying strategy, and time expectations. Class 1 involves minimal absorption, Class 3 involves extensive saturation of ceilings, walls, and insulation, and Class 4 involves deeply bound water.

Accurate classification during initial inspection is essential for defensible restoration planning under the IICRC standard of care.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains that moisture movement is governed byvapor pressure differentials. When the vapor pressure within wet materials is higher than the vapor pressure of the surrounding air, moisture naturally migrates from the materials into the air. This condition is essential for effective drying.

A drying chamber with lower vapor pressure than the wet materials creates the necessary driving force for evaporation. The WRT manual emphasizes that this differential is achieved by reducing humidity ratio through dehumidification and increasing temperature and airflow at the material surface.

If the opposite condition exists—where air vapor pressure is higher than material vapor pressure—moisture can migrate into materials, causing secondary wetting. Therefore, maintaining lower vapor pressure in the air than in the materials is a core objective of restoration drying systems.

The class or category of water does not change due to vapor pressure alone; those are classification concepts based on absorption and contamination. The correct outcome under WRT science is moisture migration from materials into the air.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains thatlow-grain refrigerant (LGR) dehumidifiersare designed to remove moisture more efficiently at lower humidity ratios than conventional refrigerant dehumidifiers. As a result, LGR units can reduceair vapor pressure to lower levelsthan standard refrigerant systems under similar conditions.

This enhanced capability allows LGR dehumidifiers to continue removing moisture even as the environment becomes drier, supporting faster and more complete drying. The WRT manual highlights this feature as a key advantage of LGR technology in most residential and light commercial drying scenarios.

LGR units do not operate effectively at freezing temperatures, are not optimized for extreme heat, and cannot achieve vapor pressure levels lower than desiccant systems. Desiccants remain superior for very low humidity or low-temperature conditions.

Therefore, the correct benefit under WRT guidance is the ability of LGR dehumidifiers to reduce vapor pressure lower than conventional refrigerant dehumidifiers.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesevaporationas the process by which water changes from a liquid state to a gaseous (vapor) state. This process is central to restorative drying because it is how moisture leaves wet materials.

The WRT manual explains that evaporation occurs at the surface of materials and is influenced by airflow, surface temperature, humidity, and vapor pressure differential. Evaporation alone does not remove moisture from the structure; it must be paired with dehumidification or ventilation to remove the vapor from the air.

Hydrostatic refers to water pressure, sublimation is the change from solid to gas, and dehumidification removes vapor from air—not liquid from materials. Understanding evaporation allows restorers to design drying systems that maximize moisture release while preventing condensation and secondary damage.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifieshygroscopic materialsas the most susceptible to secondary damage caused by elevated humidity. Hygroscopic materials readily absorb and release moisture from the surrounding air until they reach equilibrium with ambient relative humidity. Common examples include wood, paper, drywall, textiles, and many composite building materials.

The WRT manual explains that when relative humidity rises—particularly above safe thresholds—hygroscopic materials absorb moisture even without direct water contact. This can lead to swelling, warping, loss of structural integrity, finish failure, corrosion of fasteners, and increased microbial risk. This process is known assecondary damage, because it occurs after the initial water intrusion and is driven by uncontrolled environmental conditions.

Unabsorbent, hydrophobic, and non-porous materials resist moisture absorption and are far less affected by high humidity alone. While condensation may occur on these surfaces, they do not readily absorb moisture into their structure.

Because of this behavior, the WRT curriculum emphasizes aggressive humidity control during drying—not only to dry wet materials but also to protect unaffected hygroscopic materials within the drying chamber. Monitoring relative humidity and vapor pressure is therefore essential to prevent secondary damage.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains thathumidity ratio, dew point, and vapor pressure are directly related psychrometric measurements. When humidity ratio increases or decreases, both dew point and vapor pressure change proportionally.

Vapor pressure represents the energy exerted by water vapor molecules in the air. As more moisture is added to the air (higher humidity ratio), vapor pressure increases; when moisture is removed, vapor pressure decreases. Dew point follows the same pattern because it reflects the temperature at which that vapor pressure results in saturation.

Temperature and permeability are not directly proportional to humidity ratio, and dehumidification rate is a performance outcome rather than a psychrometric property.

Because vapor pressure governs moisture movement between materials and air, its proportional relationship to humidity ratio and dew point makes it one of the most important measurements in WRT drying science.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiesrelative humidity at or above approximately 70%as presenting the greatest risk for structural and microbial damage to hygroscopic materials. At this level, many materials readily absorb moisture from the air, increasing moisture content even without direct liquid water contact.

The WRT manual explains that hygroscopic materials such as wood, paper, drywall, and textiles reach higher equilibrium moisture contents as RH increases. When RH exceeds safe thresholds, these materials may swell, deform, lose structural integrity, or support microbial growth.

Microbial amplification risk also increases significantly at higher RH levels. While mold growth depends on multiple factors, sustained RH above approximately 60–70% greatly increases the likelihood of microbial activity on organic materials.

This is why restorers are trained to aggressively control humidity during drying and to monitor RH as part of daily documentation. Maintaining RH well below damaging thresholds protects unaffected materials and limits secondary damage during the restoration process.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiesdesiccant dehumidification systemsas capable of creating thelowest vapor pressurein a drying environment. Desiccant systems remove moisture through adsorption, allowing them to achieve extremely low humidity ratios and vapor pressures—lower than refrigerant-based systems can typically reach.

Because vapor pressure drives moisture movement, achieving very low air vapor pressure significantly increases the drying potential for dense or low-permeance materials. This is why desiccant systems are often specified for Class 4 drying, cold environments, or situations requiring aggressive moisture removal.

Heat-only systems increase vapor pressure unless paired with moisture removal. Inter-air systems enhance airflow but do not independently reduce vapor pressure. LGR dehumidifiers reduce vapor pressure effectively but not to the same extent as desiccants.

The WRT curriculum emphasizes that system selection must be based on drying objectives and material characteristics, with desiccants reserved for scenarios requiring maximum vapor pressure reduction.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge provides initial LGR dehumidification recommendations based oncubic footage and class of water. ForClass 3 water intrusions, a commonly taught starting guideline is approximatelyone LGR dehumidifier (≈100–150 PPD) per 3,000 cubic feetof affected space.

In this scenario, the drying chamber volume is 7,500 cubic feet. Dividing 7,500 by 3,000 yields 2.5 units. Because dehumidifiers cannot be fractionally deployed and WRT guidance supports roundingupto ensure adequate moisture removal, the initial recommendation isthree LGR dehumidifiers.

The WRT manual emphasizes that this is an initial placement subject to adjustment after monitoring confirms drying progress. Insufficient dehumidification can increase ambient humidity, slow drying, and elevate secondary damage risk—particularly in Class 3 losses where evaporation rates are high.

Placing three units provides adequate capacity to manage evaporated moisture while allowing later downsizing as drying goals are achieved.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge teaches that the suitability of outdoor air for ventilation drying depends onhumidity ratio, not relative humidity alone. The best outdoor air conditions are those with thelowest humidity ratio, allowing moisture to be removed from the indoor environment.

Among the options,70°F and 30% RHhas the lowest humidity ratio, making it the most effective for ventilation. Low humidity ratio air reduces indoor vapor pressure and supports evaporation without introducing excess moisture.

High relative humidity—even at cooler temperatures—often carries more moisture than drier warm air. The WRT manual cautions restorers against using outdoor air based solely on comfort perception. Psychrometric comparison is required.

Using inappropriate outdoor air can increase indoor moisture levels and slow drying. Therefore, option C represents the best condition under WRT principles.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge defineshumidity ratioas theamount (or weight) of water vapor contained in a given weight of dry air. It is typically expressed as grains per pound (GPP) or grams per kilogram and represents an absolute measurement of moisture in the air.

Unlike relative humidity, humidity ratio does not change with temperature unless moisture is added or removed. This makes it one of the most reliable psychrometric measurements for evaluating drying potential and comparing indoor and outdoor air conditions.

The WRT manual emphasizes that humidity ratio is critical for determining vapor pressure, dew point, and the suitability of ventilation drying. Restorers frequently rely on humidity ratio to decide whether introducing outdoor air will improve or hinder drying.

Moisture content applies to materials, not air, and relative humidity is a percentage comparison rather than a mass measurement. Therefore, humidity ratio is the correct and precise term under WRT psychrometric science.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains thatrelative humidity decreaseswhen air temperature increases and no additional moisture is added. This occurs because warmer air can hold more water vapor; therefore, the same amount of moisture represents a smaller percentage of the air’s total capacity.

This principle is foundational in psychrometry and directly applied in restoration drying. By increasing temperature while controlling moisture content, restorers lower relative humidity and vapor pressure, increasing evaporation potential.

Relative humidity does not remain constant with temperature changes, nor does it increase unless moisture is added. Dew point remains unchanged unless moisture content changes.

Understanding this relationship allows restorers to use controlled heat strategically to improve drying efficiency without introducing excess moisture.

According to the IICRC WRT body of knowledge, theinitial dehumidification capacity recommendationis determined by three primary factors:cubic footage of the affected area,class of water intrusion, andtype of dehumidifierbeing used. This calculation establishes a baseline moisture removal capability required to manage the anticipated evaporation load.

Cubic footage defines the volume of air within the drying chamber and directly influences how much moisture must be removed from the environment. Theclass of waterdescribes how much moisture has been absorbed by materials and the rate of evaporation expected. Higher classes (Class 3 and 4) require substantially more dehumidification capacity due to increased moisture loading and deeply absorbed water.

Thetype of dehumidifieris equally critical because different technologies (conventional refrigerant, LGR, desiccant) have vastly different operating ranges, efficiencies, and moisture removal characteristics. The WRT manual specifically differentiates capacity calculations for LGR versus desiccant systems, as they function under different psychrometric conditions.

Factors such as category of water, subfloor type, or air mover quantity influenceprocedural decisions, safety, and drying strategy—but they are not part of the initial capacity calculation. Likewise, grain depression is a performance outcome used for evaluation, not an input variable.

This structured approach ensures consistency, defensibility, and alignment with the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard, enabling restorers to justify equipment placement using measurable, science-based criteria rather than guesswork or habit.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains that to increase therate of evaporation, the surface temperature of wet materials must beabove the dew point temperatureof the surrounding air. When a surface is warmer than the dew point, water molecules have sufficient energy to change from a liquid state to a vapor state and move into the air.

If a surface temperature falls at or below the dew point, condensation occurs instead of evaporation, adding moisture back onto the material. This condition directly opposes drying and can result in secondary damage. The WRT curriculum therefore emphasizes continuous monitoring of both air dew point and material surface temperatures to ensure evaporation conditions are maintained.

Relative humidity is not a temperature, and vapor pressure equality does not drive evaporation. Only maintaining surface temperatures above dew point ensures positive evaporation potential.

This principle is fundamental to restorative drying and is repeatedly reinforced throughout WRT psychrometric training.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge states that whenhigh-risk individuals(such as the elderly, infants, immunocompromised persons, or those with respiratory conditions) are present during aCategory 3 water intrusion, anIndoor Environmental Professional (IEP)should be retained.

Category 3 water is grossly contaminated and poses significant health risks. The WRT manual explains that an IEP provides independent assessment, sampling strategies, and recommendations to protect occupant health and guide appropriate remediation decisions.

Increasing equipment or focusing on AHAM ratings does not address health risk evaluation. Mold testing is not automatically required and may not be appropriate during active mitigation.

Retaining an IEP ensures objective decision-making, regulatory alignment, and enhanced protection for vulnerable occupants, consistent with IICRC guidance.

Refrigerant dehumidifiers remove moisture from the air through the process ofcondensation, as outlined in the IICRC WRT body of knowledge. In this process, warm, moist air is drawn across a cold evaporator coil inside the dehumidifier. When the air temperature is reduced below its dew point, water vapor changes phase from a gas to a liquid and condenses on the coil surface.

The collected liquid water then drains into a reservoir or is pumped out of the unit, while the dried air is reheated slightly and discharged back into the drying chamber. This mechanism is fundamental to both conventional refrigerant and low-grain refrigerant (LGR) dehumidifiers.

The WRT curriculum contrasts condensation withadsorption, which is used by desiccant dehumidifiers, andabsorption, which involves liquids—not air drying. Sublimation (solid to vapor) is not relevant to restoration drying.

Understanding condensation is essential because refrigerant dehumidifiers rely on sufficient temperature and humidity conditions to function efficiently. The WRT manual highlights operational limits and emphasizes monitoring to ensure that refrigerant systems are appropriate for the environmental conditions present on the job.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge recommends usinginfrared (IR) cameras and moisture sensorsto help determine the perimeter of wet carpet and cushion during the initial inspection. These tools allow restorers to quickly and non-destructively identify moisture patterns across large areas.

IR cameras can highlight temperature anomalies caused by evaporative cooling, while moisture sensors provide confirmation of moisture presence beneath carpet surfaces. The WRT manual stresses that IR imaging must always be verified with moisture detection instruments to avoid false positives.

Disengaging carpet or relying on touch is invasive, time-consuming, and unreliable. Borescopes and anemometers are not designed for carpet moisture detection.

Using appropriate detection tools supports accurate scoping, efficient drying design, and defensible documentation—core principles of professional restoration practice under the IICRC WRT standard.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifies themoisture meteras the primary instrument used to measure moisture content or moisture level in building materials. Moisture meters—either penetrating or non-penetrating—provide quantitative or comparative data necessary to establish drying goals and verify drying progress.

Thermo-hygrometers measure air conditions, thermal cameras identify temperature anomalies, and moisture sensors are typically qualitative indicators. Only moisture meters are designed to measure moisture within materials accurately and repeatably.

The WRT manual emphasizes selecting the appropriate meter type for the material being tested and documenting readings consistently. Proper moisture measurement is essential for defensible drying documentation and confirmation of project completion.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge clearly states that thefirst priority during the initial inspectionis conducting ahazard assessment. Before any restoration activities begin, technicians must identify and address conditions that could pose risks to workers, occupants, or the structure.

Common hazards in water-damaged environments include electrical risks, structural instability (such as sagging ceilings), slip and fall hazards, biological contaminants, and the presence of regulated materials like asbestos or lead. The WRT curriculum emphasizes that no mitigation action should proceed until these hazards are evaluated and controlled.

Removing water, inspecting walls, or operating HVAC systems are all important tasks—but only after safety has been ensured. The hierarchy of controls outlined in the WRT manual prioritizes hazard elimination, engineering controls, administrative controls, and PPE as appropriate.

This safety-first approach aligns with OSHA requirements and the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard, reinforcing that professional restoration begins with protecting people before protecting property.

Vapor pressureis defined in the IICRC WRT body of knowledge as the force exerted by water vapor molecules in the air against surrounding surfaces. It represents the energy level of moisture in the air and is a key driver of moisture movement.

The WRT manual explains that water vapor moves from areas of higher vapor pressure to areas of lower vapor pressure, whether between materials and air or between different air masses. This principle governs evaporation, condensation, and moisture redistribution within a drying chamber.

Relative humidity describes a percentage relationship, humidity ratio measures moisture mass, and dew point identifies saturation temperature—but vapor pressure quantifies the actualdriving force. Because vapor pressure is directly influenced by both temperature and humidity ratio, it is considered one of the most precise indicators of drying potential.

Effective drying systems focus on lowering air vapor pressure relative to wet materials, ensuring continuous moisture migration out of structural components.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge stresses thatdocumentation is a critical component of professional water damage restoration, and restorers are expected to obtain and maintain documents that validate drying progress and project completion. These records demonstrate that drying goals were properly established, monitored, and achieved in accordance with the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard.

Drying documentation typically includes moisture content or moisture level readings, moisture maps, psychrometric data (temperature, relative humidity, humidity ratio, and dew point), equipment placement records, and daily monitoring logs. Together, these documents form a defensible record that shows the restorer followed an appropriate standard of care.

The WRT manual explains that such documentation is necessary not only for communication with materially interested parties (owners, occupants, insurers) but also for dispute resolution, quality assurance, and potential legal proceedings. Without validated drying documentation, it is difficult to prove that materials were returned to a dry standard or that secondary damage was prevented.

AHAM certificates may be useful for understanding equipment performance, but they are not required project documents. Law enforcement permission and historical restoration records are unrelated to the drying verification process. Therefore, obtaining documents that validate drying and completion is the correct and required practice under WRT guidance.

Cuppingis the correct term used in the IICRC WRT body of knowledge to describe a condition where wood flooring expands due to moisture, causing the edges of each board to rise higher than the center. This deformation occurs because moisture is absorbed unevenly—typically from below—causing differential expansion across the board’s thickness.

The WRT manual explains that cupping is most commonly associated with moisture intrusion affecting subflooring or elevated humidity conditions beneath the flooring. As the underside of the board absorbs moisture, it expands more than the top surface, resulting in a concave shape across the width.

This condition is distinct fromcrowning, which is the opposite deformation where the center is higher than the edges, often occurring after sanding cupped floors before moisture equilibrium is restored.Bucklingrefers to extreme deformation where boards lift completely from the subfloor, anddelaminationapplies to layered materials separating.

Understanding cupping is essential for restorers because it influences drying strategy, expectations, and post-drying recommendations. The WRT standard emphasizes careful moisture control and adequate acclimation time to allow wood flooring to return as close as possible to its original profile before repairs or refinishing are attempted.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiescellulosic insulationas a material that must beremoved and discarded when wet. Cellulose insulation is highly absorbent and loses its insulating properties once saturated. It also retains moisture for extended periods, creating conditions conducive to microbial growth and secondary damage.

The WRT manual explains that wet cellulose insulation cannot be effectively dried in place due to its density and the way it traps moisture within wall cavities. Attempting to dry or clean it is unreliable and inconsistent with professional standards. Removal allows the wall cavity and surrounding materials to dry properly and be inspected for hidden damage.

Evaluating R-value or expansion is irrelevant once the insulation is wet. Reinstallation of new insulation may occur after drying is complete and conditions permit.

This guidance reflects the WRT emphasis on material restorability, moisture control, and prevention of long-term problems within concealed assemblies.