FIDIC CCM Certified Contract Manager Exam Practice Test

Delay Damages under FIDIC are primarily a pre-agreed measure to incentivize the Contractor to complete works on time rather than full compensation for all losses suffered. They simplify the process by avoiding the need for the Employer to prove actual losses.

Option A is incorrect; Delay Damages are generally not full compensation.

Option C is incorrect because Delay Damages remove the Employer ' s burden to prove actual loss.

Option B is the correct interpretation.

Under FIDIC contracts:

Profit is usually allowed on claims arising from Employer-caused delays, instructions, or breaches that directly affect the Contractor’s performance or costs (Options A, B, C, and E).

Option D relates to delays caused by third parties (authorities). Typically, delays caused by relevant authorities (e.g., permit or approval delays) are treated differently, and profit is not generally recoverable on these claims as they are considered neutral or force majeure-type delays. The Contractor may receive an extension of time and reimbursement of direct costs but not profit.

Thus, Option D is the claim event where profit is not allowed.

Under FIDIC Red Book 2017, Clause 1.1 [Definitions] and Clause 1.5 [Priority of Documents] define the composition and hierarchy of the Contract. The Contract is not limited to only General and Particular Conditions; it includes multiple documents such as the Contract Agreement, Letter of Acceptance, Letter of Tender, Specifications, Drawings, and Schedules. Therefore, Option A is incorrect.

Option B is correct. The term “Conditions of Contract” explicitly refers to the General Conditions as modified or amended by the Particular Conditions. This reflects how Particular Conditions adapt the standard FIDIC provisions to project-specific requirements while forming a single integrated set of contractual conditions.

Option C is incorrect because Contract Data forms part of the Particular Conditions, not the General Conditions. It contains project-specific data that complements and modifies the General Conditions.

Option D is correct. The Contract Agreement, Letter of Acceptance, and Letter of Tender are explicitly listed as core Contract documents under FIDIC 2017. These documents establish the legal formation of the Contract and define the agreed scope, price, and commitments between the Parties.

This structure ensures clarity, proper hierarchy, and enforceability of contractual obligations in FIDIC contracts.

The FIDIC Red Book (2017 edition) is traditionally used for construction contracts where the Employer provides the design, and the Contractor primarily executes the construction works. This form is suitable for Employers who have detailed and well-defined design and engineering requirements and want to retain control over the design.

The Red Book is ideal for experienced Employers who have a clear and fixed design and require the Contractor to build accordingly.

The Yellow Book is typically used where the Contractor is responsible for both design and construction (design & build). It suits Employers who want to delegate design responsibility to the Contractor.

The Silver Book is used for turnkey or EPC contracts where the Contractor takes full responsibility for design, procurement, construction, and commissioning, suitable for Employers seeking minimal involvement in design and execution details.

Hence, for an Employer who knows exactly what they want from a design and engineering perspective and wants to maintain control, the Red Book is the first and most appropriate choice.

Option B is correct: The Contractor must obtain approval from the Engineer/Employer before making design changes.

Option C is correct: The Contractor can submit Value Engineering proposals to improve efficiency or reduce costs.

Option A is incorrect; unilateral changes are not allowed.

Option D is incorrect; Value Engineering can be proposed even after initial submission.

Under the FIDIC Red Book 1999, discharge becomes effective when the Contractor has received full payment certified by the Final Payment Certificate and the return of the Performance Security (Sub-Clause 14.10). Both elements must be completed for the contract to be considered fully discharged, releasing the Contractor from further obligations or liabilities under the contract.

Option A is incomplete as payment alone does not fully discharge the Contractor.

Option B is incomplete as return of Performance Security alone is insufficient.

Option D is incorrect because the contract does not require a discharge notice signed by the Employer beyond these conditions.

This statement is true. The FIDIC suite of contracts, including Red, Yellow, and Silver Books, have evolved from earlier editions and contract models, but they retain a common structure, terminology, and approach to risk allocation. This familiarity allows professionals who know one FIDIC contract to adapt more easily to other FIDIC contracts or updated editions. For example, common terms like Engineer, Employer, Contractor, Variation, and Claims exist across editions with consistent meaning.

The modular and familiar structure supports easier contract administration, negotiation, and interpretation. However, differences in clauses, obligations, and procedures between editions (e.g., 1999 vs. 2017) require careful review. Nevertheless, the shared foundations mean prior experience provides valuable understanding, streamlining learning and application.

Under FIDIC Red Book 2017, Clause 1.3 [Communications] provides strict and structured requirements governing Notices and other forms of communication. The distinction between a “Notice” and “other communication” is critical because Notices often trigger contractual rights, obligations, and time bars.

Option A is correct because Clause 1.3 expressly requires that a communication intended to be a Notice must be clearly identified as such. This ensures that both Parties understand the formal and legal significance of the communication, particularly where time-sensitive provisions (such as claims under Clause 20) are involved.

Option C is also correct. Clause 1.3 differentiates between Notices and other communications. Where a communication is not a Notice, it should still be clearly identified as another form of communication and, where appropriate, include references to the relevant contractual provision. This promotes clarity, traceability, and proper contract administration.

Option B is incorrect because communications must generally be sent to the addresses stated in the Contract Data unless formally changed by notice. Delivering to an alternative address without proper notification may render the communication invalid.

Option D is incorrect because communications are not limited to the Contractor’s Representative; they must be sent to the designated addresses of the respective Parties as defined in the Contract Data.

Overall, Clause 1.3 reinforces disciplined communication management, which is a cornerstone of effective FIDIC contract administration.

Under FIDIC 2017, Employer’s Claims are governed by Clause 20.2 [Claims For Payment and/or EOT]. The first procedural step is the submission of a Notice of Claim.

Option A is correct because the Employer must notify the Engineer of the event or circumstance giving rise to the claim. This notice must clearly describe the basis of the claim, including the relevant facts (e.g., delay, cost, or Defects Notification Period extension).

Option B is also correct. FIDIC 2017 introduces a strict 28-day time bar for both Parties. The claiming Party (including the Employer) must give notice “as soon as practicable” and no later than 28 days after becoming aware (or when it should have become aware) of the event. Failure to comply may result in loss of entitlement.

Option C is incorrect because it is irrelevant and misrepresents the structured claims procedure under Clause 20.

Option D is incorrect for the first step. While later submissions (fully detailed claim under Sub-Clause 20.2.4) require detailed particulars including contractual basis, the initial notice does not require full legal substantiation—only identification of the event/circumstance.

This structured two-step process (Notice → Fully Detailed Claim) is central to FIDIC 2017’s claims management system, ensuring early warning and proper administration of claims.

Option A is NOT a Variation because it originates from a Value Engineering proposal by the Contractor, not from Employer or Engineer instruction or request.

Options B, C, and D are all variations initiated by the Employer or Engineer.

Under Sub-Clause 8.3 of the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 2017, the revised programme must reflect:

The planned sequence and timing of works including recognized holidays (Option A) to ensure realistic scheduling.

The actual progress to date, delays, and impacts on subsequent activities (Option B) so that stakeholders can manage resources and risks effectively.

Option C (remedial work) is typically not part of the main programme but may be in a separate defect rectification schedule.

Option D is too narrow; the programme should include all activities, not only undelivered materials.

Under FIDIC Red Book 1999, the Engineer plays a key role in determining claims submitted by the Contractor (Clause 20). If the Engineer fails to make a determination within the prescribed time, the Parties may be unable to resolve the dispute and thus the matter may proceed to dispute resolution mechanisms.

Option B is correct because if the Engineer does not decide, the claim remains unsettled, and the Parties are left to resolve the dispute, often via Dispute Adjudication Board or arbitration.

Option A is incorrect; claims must comply with notice requirements to be valid.

Option C is incorrect because the Engineer may request further particulars but is not obligated to give a final decision on quantum immediately.

Option D is incorrect as the Engineer, not the Employer’s Representative, first responds to claims.

Option E is incorrect since the Engineer’s decision is not final and binding if disputed; it may be challenged.

Under FIDIC 1999 (both Yellow Book and Silver Book), Clause 8.1 clearly states that the Contractor “shall commence the design and execution of the Works as soon as is reasonably practicable after the Commencement Date.” This clause establishes the formal contractual obligation and timing for starting the Works, but it does not expressly prohibit the Contractor from undertaking preparatory activities—such as preliminary design—before the Commencement Date.

However, any such early design activity is not covered by the contractual protections that apply after the Commencement Date. This means the Contractor proceeds entirely at its own risk. For example, if changes arise due to late Employer requirements, Engineer’s instructions, or modifications in the Employer’s Requirements, the Contractor cannot automatically claim additional time or cost for rework associated with pre-commencement design.

From a contract management perspective, this reflects a key FIDIC principle: risk allocation follows contractual triggers. Since the Commencement Date activates obligations and entitlements (including EOT and cost claims under Clause 20), activities performed before this date fall outside those mechanisms unless explicitly agreed otherwise.

Therefore, while early design is not forbidden, it is commercially risky, and prudent Contractors typically avoid significant pre-commencement commitments without formal authorization.

Under FIDIC Red Book and Yellow Book 1999, Sub-Clause 14.3 [Application for Interim Payment Certificates] governs the Contractor’s obligations when submitting statements for interim payments.

Option B is correct because the Statement must include amounts relating to Provisional Sums where applicable. These sums form part of the Contract Price adjustments and must be reflected in interim applications when instructed or executed.

Option C is also correct. Sub-Clause 14.3 explicitly requires that each Statement be accompanied by supporting documents. This includes records of progress and, importantly, the progress report under Sub-Clause 4.21 [Progress Reports], ensuring that the Engineer can properly assess the value of work done.

Option A is incorrect because FIDIC does not mandate submission “in five copies” nor submission directly to the Employer; typically, submissions are made to the Engineer, and the number of copies is not fixed in the General Conditions.

Option D is incorrect as stated. While Plant and Materials may be considered under Sub-Clause 14.5 [Plant and Materials intended for the Works], their inclusion is subject to specific conditions and certification, not simply “added and deducted” generically within every Statement.

Thus, the correct application aligns with procedural compliance, proper substantiation, and inclusion of relevant financial components as per Clause 14.

Local procurement laws, regulations, and internal governance rules often apply in addition to or alongside FIDIC contract provisions. Employers, whether public or private, must comply with applicable national or sector-specific rules, which may affect procurement procedures, documentation, and contract award processes.

Option C is correct because procurement requirements depend on local legal systems, the nature of the Employer, and applicable governance.

Option A is incorrect as FIDIC contracts provide contractual frameworks but do not override local legal obligations.

Option B is incorrect because many Employers have procurement policies.

Option D is incorrect since private entities may also be subject to procurement laws or internal policies.

This statement is true. The FIDIC Yellow and Silver Books (2017 editions) include a clear provision that the Works, or the parts designed by the Contractor, must be fit for their ordinary purposes, reflecting the Contractor’s responsibility for design and performance. This introduces an express fitness-for-purpose obligation, which was less explicit in earlier editions.

This provision clarifies risk allocation related to design liability, ensuring that the Contractor is accountable for the fitness of the designed works unless otherwise specified.

Under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 1999 editions, the Engineer acts as the Employer ' s representative with authority delegated under the contract. When an instruction requires the Employer’s prior approval, it is primarily the Engineer’s responsibility to obtain that approval before issuing the instruction to the Contractor.

The Contractor is not contractually required to verify whether the Engineer has obtained the Employer’s approval. The Contractor is generally entitled to rely on the Engineer’s instructions as valid and binding unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.

This principle avoids placing an undue administrative burden on the Contractor and maintains the hierarchical contract administration structure, where the Engineer is the primary point of contact and decision-maker.

Under FIDIC Red Book 1999, Sub-Clause 1.3 [Communications] governs the delivery of notices and other communications. The clause clearly specifies that communications must be sent to the addresses stated in the Contract Data. This ensure s certainty, traceability, and contractual validity of all formal correspondence between the Parties.

Option A is therefore correct, as the Contract Data defines the official addresses for communication. These addresses are agreed at the outset and form the primary reference point for valid notice delivery.

Option B is also correct. Sub-Clause 1.3 further allows that if a Party notifies the other of a change of address, then communications may be delivered to that updated address. This reflects practical contract administration, where offices or contact details may change during the project lifecycle. However, such change must be formally communicated.

Option C is incorrect because the Site address is not automatically a valid address for formal notices unless explicitly stated in the Contract Data. Delivering notices to the Site could create disputes regarding receipt and validity.

Option D is also incorrect. While the Contractor’s Representative plays a key role in project execution (under Clause 4.3), the Representative’s address is not necessarily the formal address for contractual notices unless it is specifically designated in the Contract Data.

This clause highlights the importance of proper notice procedures in FIDIC contracts, as improper delivery may invalidate claims or contractual rights.

Under FIDIC 2017, Clause 8.3 [Programme] was significantly enhanced compared to the 1999 editions, introducing more detailed and stricter requirements for programme management and updating.

Option A is correct. The 2017 editions explicitly require the Contractor to revise and resubmit the Programme whenever it becomes inconsistent with actual progress. This strengthens proactive project control and ensures that the Programme remains a live and reliable management tool.

Option C is also correct. FIDIC 2017 emphasizes that revised programmes must accurately reflect actual progress and current circumstances, including sequencing, logic, and resources. This aligns with the broader 2017 philosophy of improved transparency and contract administration.

Option B is incorrect because FIDIC does not mandate specifying particular programming software; this remains at the Contractor’s discretion unless otherwise stated in Particular Conditions.

Option D is incorrect because submission of a programme within 28 days already existed in FIDIC 1999 (Sub-Clause 8.3), and therefore is not a “new” feature.

These enhancements reflect FIDIC 2017’s focus on active project management, early warning, and accurate planning, making the Programme a central tool for monitoring and controlling project performance.

Option A is correct: Certification and payment of interim payments are conditional on Employer’s receipt of the Contractor’s appointment and the Advance Payment Guarantee (Sub-Clause 14.2.1).

Option D is correct: Payment also requires receipt of the Contractor’s statement supported by relevant documentation.

Option B alone is insufficient without supporting documents.

Option C relates to appointment and performance security but is not a stated precondition for payment certification.

Under FIDIC Red and Yellow Books (both 1999 and 2017), once a Section or Part of the Works has been taken over by the Employer, even if a formal Taking-Over Certificate has not yet been issued, the practical effect is that the Works (or relevant Section) are considered completed and under the Employer’s control.

Clause 13 [Variations and Adjustments] allows the Engineer to instruct Variations only before the Works or a Section are taken over. After taking-over, the Contractor’s obligations shift from execution to remedying defects under Clause 11 [Defects Notification Period] . At this stage, the Contractor is no longer required to carry out new work beyond rectification unless separately agreed.

Therefore, once a Section/Part is taken over, the Engineer cannot instruct a Variation to that part of the Works. Any further work would require a separate agreement or contract, not a Variation under Clause 13.

This reflects a key FIDIC principle: Variations relate to the execution phase, not the post-completion (defects liability) phase. Thus, the statement is false.

Option A is NOT correct because the wording of the Letter of Tender is usually governed by the tender documents and contract terms; it is not solely at the Contractor ' s discretion to dictate when the Contract becomes effective. The standard process is that the Contract becomes effective upon the Employer’s issuance of the Letter of Acceptance.

Options B, C, and D correctly describe standard FIDIC practices.

Under the FIDIC Red Book 2017, Clause 21 establishes a standing Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB) as a default requirement. This is a major evolution from the 1999 edition, where a Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) could be ad hoc. Therefore, Option C is correct, as the General Conditions clearly provide for a standing DAAB appointed at the outset of the Contract.

Option D is also correct. The appointment procedure for DAAB members requires mutual agreement between the Parties. Even if one Party nominates a member, that nomination must be accepted by the other Party to ensure neutrality, independence, and confidence in the dispute resolution process.

Option A is incorrect because amicable settlement (Clause 21.5) is required after a DAAB decision and before arbitration, not before referring a matter to the DAAB.

Option B is incorrect because DAAB decisions are binding immediately (whether or not final), unless and until revised by arbitration. They are not dependent on prior confirmation by arbitration to be binding.

Option E is incorrect because failure to give a Notice of Dissatisfaction (NoD) relates to a DAAB decision becoming final and binding—not an Engineer’s determination. The statement incorrectly mixes procedural steps.

These provisions reflect FIDIC’s structured multi-tier dispute resolution system, promoting early resolution through DAAB before escalation to arbitration.

This clause breaches Golden Principles (GP) 1 and 3:

GP1 promotes fairness and balanced risk allocation between parties. Forcing the Contractor to carry out determinations despite a notice of dissatisfaction undermines fair dispute resolution and contractual balance.

GP3 emphasizes the importance of clear and unambiguous contract drafting that reflects agreed procedures. This sentence introduces ambiguity and overrides contractual rights to dispute determinations.

Under FIDIC Yellow Book 1999, Sub-Clause 5.2 [Contractor’s Documents] requires the Contractor to submit design documents to the Engineer for review. Importantly, the responsibility for planning and coordinating these submissions lies with the Contractor.

The Contractor must ensure that the programme (Clause 8.3) allows sufficient time for the Engineer’s review process, including any resubmissions that may be required if documents are not approved initially. This reflects the design responsibility placed on the Contractor in the Yellow Book, where the Contractor controls both design and execution.

The Engineer’s role is to review and respond within the time stated in the Contract, but the Engineer is not responsible for integrating this review time into the overall project schedule. Similarly, the Employer has no direct role in managing this timing.

From a contract management perspective, failure by the Contractor to allow adequate review time may lead to delays for which the Contractor bears responsibility, as such delays would not typically qualify for Extension of Time unless caused by the Engineer exceeding prescribed review periods.

Thus, proper programming and coordination of document submissions is a key Contractor obligation, making Option A correct.

Both statements are correct:

Y is right that payment of Delay Damages does not relieve the Contractor from completing the Works.

You are also correct that excessive deduction of Delay Damages can reduce the Contractor’s cash flow, potentially worsening delays.

This situation requires careful balance between enforcing contractual rights and maintaining project progress.

Option C is correct: The Contractor must revise the programme whenever it no longer accurately reflects progress or obligations.

Option D is correct: The Contractor must also revise the programme upon formal request if it fails contract compliance or progress reflection.

Option A is incorrect; the Contractor has ongoing obligations beyond formal requests.

Option B is incorrect; no 42-day threshold applies in the contract for revision.

Option B is correct: Notices are compulsory when required and must reference the relevant Sub-Clause to be valid.

Option D is correct: Notices are formal written communications and must comply with the contract’s prescribed procedures.

Option A is incorrect; notices are often mandatory, not merely recommended.

Option C is incorrect; notices are obligations for all Contract Participants, not just the Engineer.

Option B is correct: The Contract Data provides information required by specific Sub-Clauses in the General Conditions to complete the contract.

Option D is correct: If required data is missing in the Contract Data, some Sub-Clauses may not apply.

Option A is incorrect; definitions generally apply throughout the contract including Specifications and Drawings.

Option C is incorrect; case sensitivity of terms can affect contractual meaning.

In the FIDIC Red Book 2017, Instructions to Tenderers are part of the tender documents but are distinct from the Employer’s Requirements. They guide tenderers on how to prepare and submit their tenders. Specifically, Instructions to Tenderers may require tenderers to provide detailed information about their organization, key personnel, and the Contractor ' s Representative (see Sub-Clause 4.3 on Contractor’s Representative and Sub-Clause 6.12 on Key Personnel), which is essential for evaluating the capability and resources of the tenderer.

Option A is incorrect because Instructions to Tenderers are separate from Employer’s Requirements; the latter define the scope and technical needs of the project.

Option B is incorrect; Contract Data may include specific data relevant to the particular project beyond just the General Conditions, including amendments and project-specific information.

Option D is incorrect because the General Conditions can be amended through the Particular Conditions (within limits), provided the amendments are balanced and agreed upon by both Parties.

This statement is true. The Employer administers the contract unless an Employer’s Representative or Engineer is appointed to act on its behalf. The Employer (or its Representative) is responsible for reviewing and negotiating claims in good faith with the Contractor to reach agreement, in line with FIDIC procedures.

Option A is correct: The Employer may sell or dispose of any items left by the Contractor and reinstate the Site, recovering costs from the Contractor.

Option C is correct: The Employer is entitled to recover costs for clearing, reinstatement, and disposal exceeding proceeds from sale.

Option B is incorrect; the Engineer does not hold this authority, but the Employer does under the contract.

Option D is incorrect; if the Contractor fails to clear the Site, the Employer may take action to protect the Site.

Under FIDIC Yellow Book 1999, Sub-Clause 4.24 (“Unforeseeable Physical Conditions”) deals with unexpected discoveries such as archaeological finds. The Engineer’s role includes ensuring site safety, notifying the Employer and relevant authorities, and managing the implications through variations.

Option B reflects best practice: securing the site, appointing guards, notifying Employer and authorities, and requesting a formal Variation Notice to cover costs and entitlement to extension of time.

Options A and D are unsafe or legally risky actions that could damage the find and breach legal obligations. Option C delays the necessary immediate protective actions.

This statement is true. The Silver Book (EPC/Turnkey contracts) usually involves lump-sum payment, but if part payment is based on quantity or work done, this must be explicitly provided for in the Particular Conditions to avoid ambiguity.

Such provisions ensure clarity on payment terms in line with project specifics.

Under the FIDIC Red Book 2017, Clause 12 [Measurement and Evaluation], specifically Sub-Clause 12.1 [Works to be Measured] , establishes that the Works shall be measured, and payment shall be based on the actual quantities of work executed in accordance with the Contract.

The key principle is that measurement is based on the “net actual quantities” of each item of Permanent Works. This means that only the final in-place quantities are considered, excluding wastage, shrinkage, or temporary excesses unless explicitly stated otherwise in the Contract. Therefore, Option A correctly reflects this fundamental rule.

Option B is incorrect because FIDIC does not generally allow additions for shrinkage or material losses unless expressly provided in the Particular Conditions or Specifications. Measurement is based on completed work, not material input.

Option C is incorrect because if an item is not included in the Bill of Quantities, valuation is determined under Sub-Clause 12.3 [Evaluation], where the Engineer determines appropriate rates—not the Contractor unilaterally.

Option D is incorrect because Option A is clearly aligned with FIDIC provisions.

Thus, Option A correctly represents the measurement methodology under FIDIC Red Book 2017.

The Contractor may submit Value Engineering proposals to improve efficiency or reduce costs; however, it is not an absolute contractual obligation to submit such proposals. Also, the preparation of these proposals is generally at the Contractor’s own cost initially. If the proposal is accepted and results in a Variation, then adjustments to the Contract Price may occur, potentially reimbursing the Contractor.

Thus, both statements are false.

FIDIC’s Golden Principles emphasize clarity, fairness, and completeness in contract drafting and administration. Incorrect applications often create risks, ambiguities, and disputes.

Option A is correct and reflects a good application of Golden Principles. When deleting clauses from the General Conditions, these must be replaced adequately in the Particular Conditions so that no essential contractual scope or responsibilities are lost or left undefined.

Option B is incorrect and reflects an improper deviation from the standard. The standard Commencement Date notification period is 42 days after the Contractor receives the Letter of Acceptance (per Sub-Clause 8.1). Extending it to 60 days without valid reason or clear agreement introduces uncertainty and potential delay.

Option C can be a legitimate contractual modification, provided it is agreed by the parties. Extending the Contractor’s notice period for suspension from 21 days to 3 months is a significant change but not inherently contrary to Golden Principles if done transparently and fairly.

Option D is incorrect and reflects a poor application of Golden Principles. Deleting all clauses referring to the DAAB/DAB (Dispute Adjudication Board) removes a critical dispute avoidance and resolution mechanism, undermining contract fairness and efficiency.

Therefore, Options B and D represent incorrect applications of the Golden Principles.

This statement is true. Under FIDIC Silver Book 1999, Sub-Clause 8.6, the Employer can instruct the Contractor to submit a revised programme to meet the contractual Time for Completion. If, after such instruction, the revised programme still shows the Works will not complete on time, the Employer may claim additional costs (such as delay damages or compensation) due to continued delay.

Thus, the Employer’s right to claim additional costs is contingent on the revised programme not enabling timely completion.

According to the FIDIC 2017 editions (Red, Yellow, and Silver Books), when the Contractor submits a revised programme, the Engineer or Employer has a limited time (typically 14 days) to review and raise any Notice of Non-Compliance if the programme does not meet contract requirements (Sub-Clause 8.3 or equivalent). If no notice is issued within this period, the Engineer or Employer is deemed to have no objection to the revised programme.

This does not imply formal approval or consent, but the programme can be used for the execution and administration of the works in the absence of objections. This avoids unnecessary delay due to inaction.

Option D is correct as it captures this deemed “no objection” position.

Option B is incorrect as “deemed consent” is stronger than FIDIC provisions state; it is more correct to say “no objection”.

Option A is incorrect since the Contractor does not have to remind the Engineer or Employer for consent within this period.

Option C is incorrect because the Contractor may proceed if no non-compliance is notified.

Under FIDIC 2017 (Clause 19 [Insurance]), the contract defines the typical mandatory insurances that the Contractor must obtain and maintain. These are designed to cover key project risks and ensure financial protection for both Parties.

Option A is correct. Insurance for injury to persons and damage to property corresponds to third-party liability insurance under Sub-Clause 19.2. This is a fundamental requirement, covering bodily injury, death, or property damage caused by the execution of the Works.

Option C is also correct. Insurance of Goods, materials, and Contractor’s Equipment brought to the Site forms part of the insurance of the Works and related items under Sub-Clause 19.1. This ensures protection against loss or damage during construction.

Option B is incorrect because FIDIC does not define a specific “Force Majeure Insurance.” Force Majeure (now referred to as Exceptional Events in 2017) is addressed contractually under Clause 18, not through a dedicated insurance requirement.

Option D is incorrect because “insurance for non-performance” is not part of the standard insurance framework. Instead, performance risk is typically addressed through Performance Security (Clause 4.2) rather than insurance.

These provisions reflect FIDIC’s structured approach to risk management—separating insurable risks (covered under Clause 19) from contractual/commercial risks managed through securities and contractual remedies.

Under FIDIC 2017, Sub-Clause 8.3 [Programme] introduces a clearer and more structured mechanism for the review and acceptance of the Contractor’s Programme. When the Contractor submits a revised programme, the Engineer (or Employer in the Silver Book) has a defined period—typically 14 days—to review it and issue a Notice of Non-Compliance if the programme does not meet contractual requirements.

If no such notice is issued within this timeframe, the contract provides a “deemed acceptance” (deemed consent) mechanism. This means that the Engineer is considered to have accepted the revised programme, and it becomes the operative Programme for the Works.

Option B correctly reflects this concept. It ensures continuity of project execution and prevents administrative delays caused by inaction. This is aligned with FIDIC 2017’s emphasis on efficiency, proactive management, and avoidance of bottlenecks.

Option D is incorrect because “no objection” is weaker than “deemed consent.” FIDIC explicitly uses the concept of consent, not merely absence of objection. Options A and C contradict the contract’s intent of maintaining workflow.

Thus, the clause ensures that lack of response does not hinder progress, reinforcing disciplined contract administration.

Option C is NOT correct. FIDIC Yellow Book General Conditions aim to allocate risks fairly and equitably between the Employer and Contractor. The contract balances risks according to who is best able to manage them. It does not impose a disproportionate risk burden on the Contractor.

Options A, B, and D are correct statements describing typical contract formation, risk allocation, and Contractor’s design and execution responsibilities.