Databricks Databricks-Certified-Associate-Developer-for-Apache-Spark-3.5 Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.5 – Python Exam Practice Test

To define a micro-batch interval, the correct syntax is:

query = df.writeStream \

outputMode("append") \

trigger(processingTime='5 seconds') \

start()

This schedules the query to execute every 5 seconds.

Continuous mode (used in Option A) is experimental and has limited sink support.

Option D is incorrect because processingTime must be a string (not an integer).

Option B triggers as fast as possible without interval control.

When writing DataFrames to files using the Spark DataFrameWriter API, Spark by default raises an error if the target path already exists. To explicitly overwrite existing data, you must specify the write mode as "overwrite".

Correct Syntax:

df.write.mode("overwrite").json("path/to/file")

This command removes the existing file or directory at the specified path and writes the new output in JSON format.

Other supported save modes include:

"append" — Adds new data to existing files.

"ignore" — Skips writing if the path already exists.

"error" or "errorifexists" — Fails the job if the output path exists (default).

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Defaults to "error" mode, which fails if the path exists.

B: "append" only adds data; it does not overwrite existing data.

C: .option("overwrite") is invalid — mode("overwrite") must be used instead.

References (Databricks Apache Spark 3.5 – Python / Study Guide):

PySpark API Reference: DataFrameWriter.mode() — describes valid write modes including "overwrite".

PySpark API Reference: DataFrameWriter.json() — method to write DataFrames in JSON format.

Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark Exam Guide (June 2025): Section “Using Spark DataFrame APIs” — Reading and writing DataFrames using save modes, schema management, and partitioning.

===========

The Spark History Server provides a web UI for viewing past completed applications, including event logs, stages, and performance metrics.

If disabled:

Spark jobs still run normally,

But users lose the ability to review historical job metrics, DAGs, or logs after completion.

Thus, debugging, performance analysis, and audit capabilities are lost.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Disabling History Server doesn’t manage logs.

B/D: Minimal overhead; disabling doesn’t improve runtime speed or executor performance.

Option B is the correct and idiomatic approach in PySpark to split a string column (like email) based on a delimiter such as "@".

The split(col("email"), "@") function returns an array with two elements: username and domain.

getItem(0) retrieves the first part (username).

getItem(1) retrieves the second part (domain).

withColumn() is used to create new columns from the extracted values.

Example from official Databricks Spark documentation on splitting columns:

from pyspark.sql.functions import split, col

df.withColumn("username", split(col("email"), "@").getItem(0)) \

withColumn("domain", split(col("email"), "@").getItem(1))

⚠️ Why other options are incorrect:

A uses fixed substring indices (substr(0, 5)), which won’t correctly extract usernames and domains of varying lengths.

C uses substring_index, which is available but less idiomatic for splitting emails and is slightly less readable.

D removes "@" from the email entirely, losing the separation between username and domain, and ends up duplicating values in both fields.

Therefore, Option B is the most accurate and reliable solution according to Apache Spark 3.5 best practices.

To use a Python function as a UDF (User Defined Function) in Spark SQL, it must first be registered using spark.udf.register().

Correct usage:

spark.udf.register("cube_func", cube_func)

num_df.selectExpr("cube_func(num)").show()

This registers cube_func as a callable SQL function available in expressions or queries.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: You must wrap with udf() or selectExpr; calling plain Python functions won’t work.

C: createDataFrame is for building DataFrames, not calling UDFs.

D: DataFrames cannot directly register UDFs.

The correct answer is B because it uses the new function count_if, introduced in Spark 3.5.0, which simplifies conditional counting within aggregations.

F.count_if(condition) counts the number of rows that meet the specified boolean condition.

In this example, it directly counts how many times spot_price >= min_price evaluates to true, replacing the older verbose combination of when/otherwise and filtering or summing.

Official Spark 3.5.0 documentation notes the addition of count_if to simplify this kind of logic:

“Added count_if aggregate function to count only the rows where a boolean condition holds (SPARK-43773).”

Why other options are incorrect or outdated:

A uses a legacy-style method of adding a flag column (when().otherwise()), which is verbose compared to count_if.

C performs a simple min/max aggregation—useful but unrelated to conditional array operations or the updated functionality.

D incorrectly applies .filter() after .agg() which will cause an error, and misuses string "min_price" rather than the variable.

Therefore, B is the only option leveraging new functionality from Spark 3.5.0 correctly and efficiently.

The correct approach to perform a parallelized groupBy operation across Spark worker nodes using Pandas API is via applyInPandas. This function enables grouped map operations using Pandas logic in a distributed Spark environment. It applies a user-defined function to each group of data represented as a Pandas DataFrame.

As per the Databricks documentation:

"applyInPandas() allows for vectorized operations on grouped data in Spark. It applies a user-defined function to each group of a DataFrame and outputs a new DataFrame. This is the recommended approach for using Pandas logic across grouped data with parallel execution."

Option A is correct and achieves this parallel execution.

Option B (mapInPandas) applies to the entire DataFrame, not grouped operations.

Option C uses built-in aggregation functions, which are efficient but not customizable with Pandas logic.

Option D creates a scalar Pandas UDF which does not perform a group-wise transformation.

Therefore, to run a groupBy with parallel Pandas logic on Spark workers, Option A using applyInPandas is the only correct answer.

To ensure that data written out to disk is sorted, it is important to consider how Spark writes data when saving to Parquet tables. The methods .sort() or .orderBy() apply a global sort but do not guarantee that the sorting will persist in the final output files unless certain conditions are met (e.g. a single partition via .coalesce(1) — which is not scalable).

Instead, the proper method in distributed Spark processing to ensure rows are sorted within their respective partitions when written out is:

sortWithinPartitions("column_name")

According to Apache Spark documentation:

"sortWithinPartitions() ensures each partition is sorted by the specified columns. This is useful for downstream systems that require sorted files."

This method works efficiently in distributed settings, avoids the performance bottleneck of global sorting (as in .orderBy() or .sort()), and guarantees each output partition has sorted records — which meets the requirement of consistently sorted data.

Thus:

Option A and B do not guarantee the persisted file contents are sorted.

Option C introduces a bottleneck via .coalesce(1) (single partition).

Option D correctly applies sorting within partitions and is scalable.

In Spark, when a CSV row does not match the provided schema, Spark does not raise an error by default. Instead, it returns null for fields that cannot be parsed correctly.

In the first row, "hello" cannot be cast to Integer for the age field → Spark sets age=None

In the second row, "20" is a valid integer → age=20

So the output will be:

[Row(name='bambi', age=None), Row(name='alladin', age=20)]

Final Answer: C

The number of tasks is controlled by the number of partitions. By default, spark.sql.shuffle.partitions is 200. If stages are showing very few tasks (less than total cores), you may not be leveraging full parallelism.

From the Spark tuning guide:

"To improve performance, especially for large clusters, increase spark.sql.shuffle.partitions to create more tasks and parallelism."

Thus:

A is correct: increasing shuffle partitions increases parallelism

B is wrong: it further reduces parallelism

C is invalid: increasing dataset size doesn’t guarantee more partitions

D is irrelevant to task count per stage

Final Answer: A

To process data in fixed micro-batch intervals, use the .trigger(processingTime="interval") option in Structured Streaming.

Correct usage:

query = df.writeStream \

outputMode("append") \

trigger(processingTime="5 seconds") \

start()

This instructs Spark to process available data every 5 seconds.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: continuous triggers are for continuous processing mode (different execution model).

C: once=True runs the stream a single time (batch mode).

D: Default trigger runs as fast as possible, not fixed intervals.

The correct way to load specific columns from an ORC file is to first load the file using .load() and then apply .select() on the resulting DataFrame. This is valid with .read.format("orc") or the shortcut .read.orc().

df = spark.read.format("orc").load("/file/test_data.orc").select("col1", "col2")

Why others are incorrect:

A performs selection after filtering, but doesn’t match the intention to minimize memory at load.

B incorrectly tries to use .select() before .load(), which is invalid.

C uses a non-existent .selected() method.

D correctly loads and then selects.

Operations that trigger data movement across partitions (like groupBy, join, repartition) result in a shuffle and a new stage.

From Spark documentation:

“groupBy and aggregation cause data to be shuffled across partitions to combine rows with the same key.”

Option A (groupBy + agg) → causes shuffle.

Options B, C, and D (filter, withColumn, select) → transformations that do not require shuffling; they are narrow dependencies.

Final Answer: A

dropDuplicates() with no column list removes duplicates based on all columns.

It's the most efficient and semantically correct way to deduplicate records that are completely identical across all fields.

From the PySpark documentation:

dropDuplicates(): Return a new DataFrame with duplicate rows removed, considering all columns if none are specified.

— Source: PySpark DataFrame.dropDuplicates() API

When using the MEMORY_AND_DISK storage level, Spark attempts to cache as much of the DataFrame in memory as possible. If the DataFrame does not fit entirely in memory, Spark will store the remaining partitions on disk. This allows processing to continue, albeit with a performance overhead due to disk I/O.

As per the Spark documentation:

"MEMORY_AND_DISK: It stores partitions that do not fit in memory on disk and keeps the rest in memory. This can be useful when working with datasets that are larger than the available memory."

— Perficient Blogs: Spark - StorageLevel

This behavior ensures that Spark can handle datasets larger than the available memory by spilling excess data to disk, thus preventing job failures due to memory constraints.

In Spark, a shuffle occurs when data needs to be redistributed across partitions or nodes, typically due to operations that require grouping, joining, or sorting.

groupBy triggers a shuffle because it aggregates data based on key values, requiring data from multiple partitions to be moved across the cluster.

Operations like filter and select are narrow transformations (no shuffle).

coalesce can reduce the number of partitions without a full shuffle (unlike repartition).

Why the other options are incorrect:

A (filter) – Narrow transformation, no shuffle.

B (select) – Simple projection, no data movement.

D (coalesce) – Reduces partitions locally without shuffle.

Watermarking in Structured Streaming defines how late a record can arrive based on event time before Spark discards it.

Behavior:

withWatermark("event_time", "10 minutes")

This means Spark will keep state for 10 minutes beyond the maximum event time seen so far.

Any data arriving later than 10 minutes after the current watermark is ignored — it will not be included in the aggregation or output.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: Late data beyond the watermark threshold is not included.

C: Late data is not moved to a new window; it’s simply dropped.

D: True for late data within the watermark threshold, not after it.

To sort a Spark DataFrame by multiple columns, use .orderBy() (or .sort()) with column expressions.

Correct syntax for descending and ascending mix:

from pyspark.sql.functions import col

df1.orderBy(col("count").desc(), col("Name").asc())

This sorts primarily by count in descending order and secondarily by Name in ascending order (alphabetically).

Why the other options are incorrect:

B/C: Default sort order is ascending; won’t place highest counts first.

D: Reverses sorting logic — sorts Name descending, not required.

Adaptive Query Execution (AQE) in Spark 3.x automatically optimizes query plans at runtime based on the actual data characteristics observed during job execution.

Key features of AQE include:

Dynamic switching of join strategies: Changes between sort-merge join and broadcast join based on actual shuffle sizes.

Coalescing shuffle partitions: Reduces small tasks and improves parallelism efficiency.

Handling skew joins: Dynamically splits large partitions to avoid data skew.

Thus, the most accurate answer describing AQE’s function is “dynamically switching join strategies.”

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: Table statistics are collected manually or by the metastore, not by AQE.

C: AQE benefits multi-stage jobs involving shuffles, not single-stage jobs.

D: Delta file optimization is handled by Databricks utilities, not AQE.

Spark Connect enables a decoupled client-server architecture, allowing remote clients to run Spark code via gRPC.

However, as of Spark 3.5, Spark Connect supports DataFrame and SQL APIs, but not RDD APIs.

Limitation:

Applications that rely heavily on RDD-based transformations or actions cannot be migrated directly to Spark Connect.

These APIs require tight driver integration, which Spark Connect intentionally decouples.

Thus, complete Spark API compatibility is not yet achieved — this is the key adoption blocker.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Debugging is possible through IDE integration and logs on the client side.

B: Spark Connect actually supports upgradable clients independent of the driver — this is an advantage, not a limitation.

D: Spark Connect provides strong isolation between the client and driver processes.

The question requires creating a dictionary where keys are region values and values are the corresponding region_id integers. Furthermore, it asks to retrieve only the smallest 3 region_id values.

Key observations:

select('region', 'region_id') puts the column order as expected by dict() — where the first column becomes the key and the second the value.

sort('region_id') ensures sorting in ascending order so the smallest IDs are first.

take(3) retrieves exactly 3 rows.

Wrapping the result in dict(...) correctly builds the required Python dictionary: { 'AFRICA': 0, 'AMERICA': 1, 'ASIA': 2 }.

Incorrect options:

Option B flips the order to region_id first, resulting in a dictionary with integer keys — not what's asked.

Option C uses .limit(3) without sorting, which leads to non-deterministic rows based on partition layout.

Option D sorts in descending order, giving the largest rather than smallest region_ids.

Hence, Option A meets all the requirements precisely.

In Apache Spark, the execution hierarchy is structured as follows:

Application: The highest-level unit, representing the user program built on Spark.

Job: Triggered by an action (e.g., collect(), count()). Each action corresponds to a job.

Stage: A job is divided into stages based on shuffle boundaries. Each stage contains tasks that can be executed in parallel.

Task: The smallest unit of work, representing a single operation applied to a partition of the data.

When the collect() action is invoked, Spark initiates a job. This job is then divided into stages at points where data shuffling is required (i.e., wide transformations). Each stage comprises tasks that are distributed across the cluster's executors, operating on individual data partitions.

This hierarchical execution model allows Spark to efficiently process large-scale data by parallelizing tasks and optimizing resource utilization.

Apache Arrow is used under the hood to optimize conversion between Pandas and PySpark DataFrames. The correct configuration setting is:

spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.enabled", "true")

From the official documentation:

“This configuration must be enabled to allow for vectorized execution and efficient conversion between Pandas and PySpark using Arrow.”

Option B is correct.

Options A, C, and D are invalid config keys and not recognized by Spark.

Final Answer: B

If each of the 10 nodes runs 4 executors, and each executor is assigned 4 CPU cores:

Executors per node = 4

Cores per executor = 4

Total executors = 4 * 10 = 40

Total cores = 40 executors * 4 cores = 160 cores

However, Spark uses 1 core for overhead on each node when managing multiple executors. Thus, the practical allocation is:

Total usable executors = 4 executors/node × 10 nodes = 40

Total cores = 4 cores × 40 executors = 160

Answer: A — but the question asks specifically about “CPU cores used by the application,” assuming all allocated cores are usable (as Spark typically runs executors without internal core reservation unless explicitly configured).

However, if you are considering 4 executors/node × 4 cores = 16 cores per node, across 10 nodes, that’s 160.

Final Answer: A

To enable fault tolerance and ensure that Spark can resume from the last committed offset after failure, you must configure a checkpoint location using the correct option key: "checkpointLocation".

From the official Spark Structured Streaming guide:

“To make a streaming query fault-tolerant and recoverable, a checkpoint directory must be specified using .option("checkpointLocation", "/path/to/dir").”

Explanation of options:

Option A uses an invalid option name: "checkpoint" (should be "checkpointLocation")

Option B is correct: it sets checkpointLocation properly

Option C lacks checkpointing and won’t resume after failure

Option D also lacks checkpointing configuration

Comprehensive Explanation:

To cover structured data processing, SQL querying, and machine learning in Apache Spark, the correct combination of components is:

Spark DataFrames: for structured data processing

Spark SQL: to execute SQL queries over structured data

MLlib: Spark's scalable machine learning library

This trio is designed for exactly this type of use case.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: GraphX is for graph processing — not needed here.

B: Pandas API on Spark is useful, but MLlib is essential for ML, which this option omits.

C: Spark Streaming is legacy; GraphX is irrelevant here.

The correct way to aggregate information (e.g., max value) from distributed workers back to the driver is using RDD actions such as reduce() or aggregate().

From the documentation:

“To perform global aggregations on distributed data, actions like reduce() are commonly used to collect summaries such as min/max/avg.”

Accumulators (Option B) do not support max operations directly and are not intended for such analytics.

Broadcast (Option C) is used to send data to workers, not collect from them.

Spark UI (Option D) is a monitoring tool — not an analytics collection interface.

Final Answer: A

The setLogLevel() method of SparkContext sets the logging level on the driver, which controls the verbosity of logs emitted during job execution. Supported levels are inherited from log4j and include the following:

ALL

DEBUG

ERROR

FATAL

INFO

OFF

TRACE

WARN

According to official Spark and Databricks documentation:

"Valid log levels include: ALL, DEBUG, ERROR, FATAL, INFO, OFF, TRACE, and WARN."

Among the choices provided, only option B (ERROR, WARN, TRACE, OFF) includes four valid log levels and excludes invalid ones like "FAIL" or "NONE".

To write a structured streaming DataFrame to Parquet files, the correct way to specify the format and output directory is:

writeStream

format("parquet")

option("path", "path/to/destination/dir")

According to Spark documentation:

“When writing to file-based sinks (like Parquet), you must specify the path using the .option("path", ...) method. Unlike batch writes, .save() is not supported.”

Option A incorrectly uses .option("location", ...) (invalid for Parquet sink).

Option B incorrectly sets the format via .option("format", ...), which is not the correct method.

Option C repeats the same issue.

Option D is correct: .format("parquet") + .option("path", ...) is the required syntax.

Final Answer: D

Underutilization with timeout warnings often indicates insufficient parallelism — meaning there aren’t enough executors to process all tasks concurrently.

Solution:

Increase the number of executors to allow more parallel task execution and better resource utilization.

Example configuration:

--conf spark.executor.instances=8

This distributes the workload more effectively across cluster nodes and reduces idle time for pending tasks.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Extending timeouts hides the symptom, not the root cause (lack of executors).

B: More memory per executor won’t fix scheduling bottlenecks.

C: Reducing partition size may increase overhead and does not fix resource imbalance.

In Pandas API on Spark (previously Koalas), the method .to_spark() converts a pyspark.pandas.DataFrame into a PySpark DataFrame.

Correct usage:

spark_df = pdf.to_spark()

This enables interoperability between the Pandas API on Spark and the PySpark SQL API, allowing developers to switch seamlessly between both for transformations or performance optimization.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A (to_pandas): Converts to a local Pandas DataFrame, not a PySpark DataFrame.

C (to_dataframe): Not a valid API method.

D (spark): Not an existing DataFrame method.

To create a Python dictionary from a Spark DataFrame, you can first collect the data to the driver node and then convert it into a Python dictionary using dict().

Steps:

Select only relevant columns.

Order by region_id to get the smallest ones.

Limit to 3 rows.

Map each row into key–value pairs.

Collect results to the driver and convert to a dictionary.

Correct code:

regions_dict = dict(

regions.orderBy("region_id")

limit(3)

rdd.map(lambda x: (x.region_id, x.region_name))

collect()

)

This produces a dictionary like:

{10: 'North', 12: 'East', 14: 'West'}

Why the other options are incorrect:

A/B: take(3) returns a list of Row objects, not key–value pairs.

C: Doesn’t order or limit by smallest IDs, so the result may not be correct.

To create an external table and enable schema merging, the correct syntax is:

CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE users

USING json

OPTIONS (

path '/data/input.json',

mergeSchema 'true'

)

mergeSchema is the correct option key (not schemaMerge)

EXTERNAL allows Spark to query files without managing their lifecycle

Adaptive Query Execution (AQE) is a powerful optimization framework introduced in Apache Spark 3.0 and enabled by default since Spark 3.2. It dynamically adjusts query execution plans based on runtime statistics, leading to significant performance improvements. The key benefits of AQE include:

Dynamic Join Strategy Selection: AQE can switch join strategies at runtime. For instance, it can convert a sort-merge join to a broadcast hash join if it detects that one side of the join is small enough to be broadcasted, thus optimizing the join operation .

Handling Skewed Data: AQE detects skewed partitions during join operations and splits them into smaller partitions. This approach balances the workload across tasks, preventing scenarios where certain tasks take significantly longer due to data skew .

Coalescing Post-Shuffle Partitions: AQE dynamically coalesces small shuffle partitions into larger ones based on the actual data size, reducing the overhead of managing numerous small tasks and improving overall query performance .

These runtime optimizations allow Spark to adapt to the actual data characteristics during query execution, leading to more efficient resource utilization and faster query processing times.

In Apache Spark's cluster mode:

"The driver program runs on the cluster’s worker node instead of the client’s local machine. This allows the driver to be close to the data and other executors, reducing network overhead and improving fault tolerance for production jobs."

(Source: Apache Spark documentation – Cluster Mode Overview)

This deployment is ideal for production environments where the job is submitted from a gateway node, and Spark manages the driver lifecycle on the cluster itself.

Option A is partially true but less specific than D.

Option B is incorrect: the driver never executes all tasks; executors handle distributed tasks.

Option C describes client mode, not cluster mode.

The correct answer is D because it uses proper time-based window aggregation along with watermarking, which is the required pattern in Spark Structured Streaming for time-based aggregations over event-time data.

From the Spark 3.5 documentation on structured streaming:

"You can define sliding windows on event-time columns, and use groupBy along with window() to compute aggregates over those windows. To deal with late data, you use withWatermark() to specify how late data is allowed to arrive."

(Source: Structured Streaming Programming Guide)

In option D, the use of:

python

CopyEdit

groupBy("sensor_id", window("timestamp", "5 minutes"))

agg(avg("temperature").alias("avg_temp"))

ensures that for each sensor_id, the average temperature is calculated over 5-minute event-time windows. To complete the logic, it is assumed that withWatermark("timestamp", "5 minutes") is used earlier in the pipeline to handle late events.

Explanation of why other options are incorrect:

Option A uses Window.partitionBy which applies to static DataFrames or batch queries and is not suitable for streaming aggregations.

Option B does not apply a time window, thus does not compute the rolling average over 5 minutes.

Option C incorrectly applies withWatermark() after an aggregation and does not include any time window, thus missing the time-based grouping required.

Therefore, Option D is the only one that meets all requirements for computing a time-windowed streaming aggregation.

Option B uses Spark’s built-in SQL function length(), which is efficient and avoids the overhead of a Python UDF:

from pyspark.sql.functions import length, col

df.select(length(col("stringColumn")).alias("length"))

Explanation of other options:

Option A is incorrect syntax; spark.udf is not called this way.

Option C registers a UDF but doesn’t apply it in the DataFrame transformation.

Option D is syntactically valid but uses a Python UDF which is less efficient than built-in functions.

Final Answer: B

The Spark UI is the standard and most effective way to inspect executor logs, task time, input size, and shuffles.

From the Databricks documentation:

“You can monitor job execution via the Spark Web UI. It includes detailed logs and metrics, including task-level execution time, shuffle reads/writes, and executor memory usage.”

(Source: Databricks Spark Monitoring Guide)

Option A is incorrect: logs are not guaranteed to be in /tmp, especially in cloud environments.

B. —verbose helps during job submission but doesn't give detailed executor logs.

D. spark-sql is a CLI tool for running queries, not for inspecting logs.

Hence, the correct method is using the Spark UI → Stages tab → Executor logs.

dedup_df = iot_bronze_df.dropDuplicates(["event_ts", "sensor_id", "metric_value"])

dropDuplicates accepts a list of columns to use for deduplication.

This ensures only unique records based on the specified keys are retained.

In Spark SQL and DataFrame operations, the configuration parameter spark.sql.shuffle.partitions defines the number of partitions created during shuffle operations such as join, groupBy, and distinct.

The default value (in Spark 3.5) is 200.

If this number is too low, Spark creates fewer tasks, leading to idle executors and poor cluster utilization.

Increasing this value allows Spark to create more tasks that can run in parallel across executors, effectively using more cluster resources.

Correct approach:

spark.conf.set("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", 400)

This increases the parallelism level of shuffle stages and improves overall resource utilization.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B: Reducing partitions further would decrease parallelism and worsen the underutilization issue.

C: Dynamic resource allocation scales executors up or down based on workload, but it doesn’t fix low task parallelism caused by insufficient shuffle partitions.

D: Increasing dataset size is not a tuning solution and doesn’t address task-level under-parallelization.

References (Databricks Apache Spark 3.5 – Python / Study Guide):

Spark SQL Configuration: spark.sql.shuffle.partitions — controls the number of shuffle partitions.

Databricks Exam Guide (June 2025): Section “Troubleshooting and Tuning Apache Spark DataFrame API Applications” — tuning strategies, partitioning, and optimizing cluster utilization.

===========